Vlog

Vice-chancellor’s job ‘isn’t to be liked’, says new Brighton head

Donna Whitehead warns university leaders must be candid with staff as sector’s financial crisis endures

Published on
September 16, 2025
Last updated
September 16, 2025
Professor Donna Whitehead
Source: University of Brighton

Despite taking up a position as vice-chancellor of the University of Brighton in February, Donna Whitehead said she never had any aspirations to become a university leader.

It’s a surprising claim for someone who has steadily risen through the ranks, having started her academic career as a lecturer at the University of Sunderland before becoming deputy vice-chancellor at London Metropolitan University.

Whitehead then served in the same role at the University of South Wales.

“Anyone who’s ever worked with me throughout my career would have heard me say numerous times I didn’t ever want to become a vice-chancellor,” she said.

Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

So what changed? Whitehead concedes that she has taken on the role at an enormously challenging time for the sector, and Brighton itself has been through a turbulent few years.

In 2023, it cut about 165 jobs as it looked to save £17 million, in a precursor to the wave of job cuts that have hit the sector since.

Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

It then closed its Brighton Centre for Contemporary Art, a university-run gallery in the centre of the city, to the outrage of locals, sparking protests and even condemnation from former Turner prizewinners.

It is undeniably a challenging period for the sector, but this is exactly what spurred Whitehead to go for the role – the only vice-chancellor position she applied for.

“There’s never been a more important time for people to put themselves forward and try and do things a bit differently,” she said.

She has bold aspirations for Brighton. She wants to “redesign what a university is and what it does”, and said the financial crisis – “which isn’t going anywhere” – means it’s time for “revolution not evolution”.

She said: “Universities find themselves in a position where they simply cannot afford to continue as they are. We can either close our eyes, hold our breath and hope for the best, or we can have difficult conversations within our universities about what we all prioritise…Universities cannot afford to be everything to everyone. There’s simply not enough money to do that.”

And for university leaders, she continued, it isn’t “our job to be liked”.

She refused to rule out continued turbulence but said sector leaders needed to be “candid” with staff. Whitehead said she would be “absolutely open and transparent with staff”.

Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

But what does radical transformation look like? Brighton recently published its 2035 strategy, pledging to build “an army of disrupters, hustlers, challengers and innovators”, with “technical knowledge and skills…at the heart of what we deliver”.

Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Although work had started on this before Whitehead joined, she said the strategy will focus on ensuring the university is “attractive”, provides “excellent outcomes” for students, and is “affordable”.

“Everything is up for redesign,” she said, including how and where courses are delivered, as well as who delivers them. A greater focus on interdisciplinary teaching could form a part of this, so “there’s less isolation and more collaboration between areas”.

She wants Brighton to become “the first institution to eradicate differential outcomes between different student groups”, including the degree awarding gap, the continuation gap and the employment gap between the most socially advantaged and disadvantaged students.

“Even without a financial crisis, the case for radical transformation is clear anyway, because the world needs more graduates than ever before,” she said.

Universities are “largely set up for students of 10 years ago”, she continued. In response to the rise of commuter students, she posited “halls of residence that can be bookable like an Airbnb”.

Ultimately, for Whitehead, it’s simple: “It’s reform or die.” And the ramification of a death would be severe.

“Any institution failing would hit and damage the entire sector, and would undermine confidence in the sector.

“We all have to look very carefully at how we fundamentally transform as institutions so we do things differently, rather than just tinkering around the edges. I personally feel incredibly optimistic that, at Brighton, we can do it.”

Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (10)

Hmm... Perhaps not, but you tend to be liked by your staff if you do a good job of being VC, and disliked if you do a bad job. So if your staff don't like you, that perhaps indicates how well you're doing.
Well let's give her the benefit of the doubt and see what she does. There's a lot of negativity and not all VCs are pants.
Her salary was £257k pa on 2023/24 , so given that Brighton have been cutting jobs to save money, one might speculate on other reasons about why academic staff are not always over fond of their VCs? Just for a contrast it was in the news that Angela Rayner as UK Deputy PM and the Minister for Housing responsible for the enture UK housing startyegy and programmes etc etc was paid c£169k pa for that huge national responsibility.
“Anyone who’s ever worked with me throughout my career would have heard me say numerous times I didn’t ever want to become a vice-chancellor,” she said. So what changed? Was she offered a £257k salary for instance?
As Mrs Merton might have asked, what was it about the £250k salary that first attracted you to the job?
"Universities are “largely set up for students of 10 years ago”, she continued. In response to the rise of commuter students, she posited “halls of residence that can be bookable like an Airbnb”." An interesting idea. Might work? These are areas where innovative thinking might just pay off. She has some good ideas?
Nothing more than a harbinger of decline and decay. Her 'ideas' will all come to nought whilst she hoovers up her outrageous £250k pa salary.
Yes another feamle appointed VC to keep everyone happy. No mention of the wasteful excess bureaucracy in UK Universities that gobble up far too much of ther money. The rest of what she says is the usual garbage that I have heard so much of, nothing interesting to say.
Tho' in fairness, and we always be fair to everyone, including VCs, her salary is at the more modest end of the spectrum as the average VC salary these days is a whopping £340 plus. I don't think we should pay attention to the person's gender. She does seem an eminently qualified person who looks OK within the parameters set and within which she has to operate, so this looks pike a good appointment to me. Ceratin;y better than that disatrous male who was VC at Dundee and paid around £340k who admitted that he was useless and not up to the job. We are lucky in that our VC is certainly one of the better ones, in my view, and also paid around the same at this person. So give her a chance. Personally I rthink it is foolish to say that being a VC is not about being liked. While that is a truism to soem extent, you don;t come out and say it as a headline. Sounds a bit like throwing the gauntlet down in my view.
new
By email: notifications@officeforstudents.org.uk (or via the OfS contact form) Subject: Urgent Regulatory Concerns at De Montfort University – Misuse of Prevent Duty, Governance Failure and Leadership Crisis under Vice-Chancellor Professor Katie Normington Dear Office for Students, I am writing as a concerned member of the De Montfort University (DMU) community to formally notify you of serious regulatory breaches and governance failures at DMU. These matters engage your responsibilities for public interest governance, student protection, freedom of speech, and the proper application of the Prevent duty. The university is in a state of profound crisis. Professor Katie Normington has faced four formal votes of no confidence, including a unanimous motion from the Professoriate (May 2025), votes at open staff Town Hall meetings, by the DMU UCU branch, and widespread calls from over 500 students and alumni via protest letter. Despite this overwhelming rejection, she refuses to resign, supported by a Board of Governors that appears captured and unwilling to act. Leadership is effectively paralysed, damaging staff morale, student experience, and the institution’s reputation. This situation has been compounded by deeply concerning actions that go to the heart of academic freedom and the misuse of public-protection policies. Particularly alarming: Misuse of the Prevent duty to intimidate and suppress staff and UCU In September/October 2025, DMU management — acting on behalf of the Vice-Chancellor and her leadership team — sent an email threatening to report staff and UCU members to the OfS under anti-terrorism Prevent guidance. This threat was issued simply because staff had organised an unofficial online town hall meeting to discuss proposed redundancies, financial mismanagement, and leadership failures. The meeting invited Leicester South MP Shockat Adam and a local Green councillor as speakers. Management, via Executive Director of People Services Bridget Donoghue, claimed the invitations posed a risk of “radicalising” students and violated a draconian internal speaker-vetting policy (requiring 28 days’ notice). They demanded the politicians be un-invited and warned of a report to the OfS. This is an extraordinary and indefensible abuse of the Prevent duty. Prevent exists to protect against genuine terrorism and radicalisation risks — not to silence legitimate trade union activity, staff criticism of job losses, or discussion involving an elected Member of Parliament. Threatening to invoke Prevent (and implying OfS support for such action) against staff exercising their right to debate institutional failures demonstrates that senior leadership has completely lost perspective. It chills free speech, constitutes potential bullying and harassment, and brings the Prevent framework into disrepute. When a university leadership resorts to weaponising counter-terrorism tools against its own staff and an elected MP for the “crime” of attending a meeting about redundancies, it is clear they have lost the plot. Such actions are incompatible with the values of higher education and your regulatory expectations around freedom of speech and academic governance. Additional serious concerns Bullying, harassment and toxic culture: Widespread allegations of intimidation under the current leadership require independent scrutiny. Financial mismanagement: Large-scale redundancies (nearly 100 academic posts and up to 300 agency staff) in Leicester are being imposed while the university has pursued high-risk international ventures, including the troubled Dubai campus (now subject to a major legal dispute with former partner Study World involving claims of over £42 million). This has contributed to the financial pressure now being felt by students and staff in the UK. Refusal to step aside: With unanimous senior academic opposition and no meaningful consensus-building possible, Professor Normington cannot effectively lead the institution. Continuing in post risks irreversible damage. Requested actions I urge the OfS to treat this as a high-priority regulatory matter and: Open an immediate formal investigation into DMU’s governance, leadership, and the specific misuse of the Prevent duty in this case. Require the Board of Governors to commission a fully independent external review (e.g., by the Committee of University Chairs or equivalent) into the Vice-Chancellor’s conduct, the no-confidence votes, Prevent misuse, bullying allegations, and financial decisions. Ensure robust protections for staff and students exercising free speech and engaging in legitimate union and democratic activities. Consider interim measures, such as enhanced monitoring or conditions on DMU’s activities, to safeguard students and public funds. DMU has already been severely damaged by years of what has been described as catastrophic mismanagement. Further inaction will compound the harm to thousands of students, staff, and the local community. I request acknowledgment of this letter and an update on next steps within 14 days. I am willing to provide further details or supporting evidence (including public reporting on the Prevent threat and no-confidence votes). Yours sincerely, [Your Full Name] References (publicly available): Leicester Gazette reporting on the Prevent threat to report staff over the UCU/staff meeting with MP Shockat Adam (October 2025) Professoriate unanimous no-confidence motion (May 2025) Staff Town Hall and UCU no-confidence votes (June 2025) Student protest letter (500+ signatories) Reporting on redundancies and Dubai campus issues

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT