糖心Vlog

Rise in right-wing extremism drives up counter-terror referrals

Formal Prevent referrals increase by almost half year-on-year, while more universities report cancelling events owing to extremist views

Published on
June 4, 2026
Last updated
June 4, 2026
Horizontal shot of armed police patrolling
Source: iStock/Wirestock

Referrals from within universities to the government鈥檚 counter-terrorism scheme increased by nearly 50 per cent last year, with cases of extreme right-wing radicalisation up by 18 per cent, new figures show.听

English higher education institutions are required to return data to the Office for Students (OfS) about cases of potential individual radicalisation as part of the government鈥檚 Prevent strategy.听

The latest data from the OfS shows 250 cases were escalated to a Prevent officer in 2024-25, down from 265 the year before but well up on the 140 cases reported five years ago.听

The number of formal external Prevent referrals grew by 46 per cent year-on-year, from 65 in 2023-24 to 95 last year.听

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Institutions are required to specify the underpinning ideology for each case. Of those formal external referrals, 45 were due to 鈥渕ixed, unclear or unstable ideology鈥, 20 to 鈥渙ther radicalisation鈥, 20 to 鈥渆xtreme right-wing radicalisation鈥 and 15 to Islamist radicalisation.听

The number of cases linked to right-wing radicalisation reached their highest levels ever, with 45 cases escalated to the Prevent lead last year, compared聽with 30 in 2023-24.听

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Formal referrals across all ideology types came from 16 per cent of providers, up from 12 per cent the previous year.听

The OfS also published data on events and external speakers, showing 42,475 events or speakers were approved last year, largely in line with figures from the previous year.听聽

Under Prevent guidance, higher education institutions must consider whether the views being expressed by speakers, or the views likely to be expressed, constitute extremist views that risk drawing people into terrorism or are shared by terrorist groups.听

This duty interacts with freedom of speech laws that require universities to secure lawful speech on campuses and protect academic freedom.听

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The data shows that 1,400 events were approved subject to mitigations or conditions in 2024-25, while 380 events or speakers were rejected across 27 higher education institutions. Of these, 320 were rejected聽because of 鈥渞easons related to procedural matters鈥.听

The number of rejections was up 78 per cent from the 220 reported last year.听

鈥淭he data we鈥檝e published today gives an overview of the important work universities and colleges are doing in relation to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism,鈥 said David Smy, deputy director of enabling regulation at the OfS.听

鈥淭his is vital to protect students and staff, including those at risk of being radicalised.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

He added it is important that 鈥渋nstitutions meet their duty to take steps to secure freedom of speech for staff, students, and visiting speakers鈥.听

鈥淥ur findings show that the vast majority of events went ahead last year, which is an encouraging sign that institutions recognise the value of robust debate.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

A new free speech complaints scheme is set to launch in September, allowing grievances to be lodged with the regulator in cases when a university is seen to have impinged on free speech and academic freedom.

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

"More universities report cancelling events owing to extremist views" I thought the key distinction was between "extremism" and "violent extremism" - the former being acceptable and basically a synonym of "interested in first principles" and the latter not acceptable. Without that distinction, the above quote indicates a problem of free expression and discussion.
Under the government's recent definition of extremism (2024) - GOV.UK, extremism is defined as the promotion of an ideology based on violence, hatred, or intolerance. While non-violent extremism (such as spreading divisive, hateful narratives that stop short of inciting violence) is not necessarily a criminal offence (though it could be construed to be in certain cases), it can legitimately trigger administrative actions like being denied public funding or access to government platforms. So Universities are justified in cancelling such events. I think the distinction here is one of criminality not no-platforming?
new
In fact, the headline contradicts the OfS report. No institutions report cancelling events owing to extremist views. Moreover, those individuals referred to Prevent - 95 out of the 2 million plus university students in England - are referred for initial assessment by a Prevent case worker. The number referred does not indicate a problem. The first assessment is called the Gateway Assessment and there may be no further action taken. In other words, a judgement will have been made that the individual is not at risk of radicalization despite being referred. Some may proceed to the next stage for consideration for adoption onto a Channel programme. Of them, assuming a similar proportion to referrals from schools, fewer than 20 of the 95 referred will be adopted. Of that small number formally classed as 'at risk of radicalization' none will have committed a criminal offence. The OfS report indicates that 77,875 university staff have key roles with regard to Prevent. Time for the Times Higher to report properly on what is involved and the woefully inadequate OfS.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT