Source: Alamy
Red alert: funding for students at private colleges has risen from 拢30鈥塵illion in 2010 to an estimated 拢1 billion this year
Labour could consider plans to cut the maximum fee that private colleges can charge to the public loans system from 拢6,000 to 拢3,000.
Meanwhile, a senior figure in the Liberal Democrats has indicated support for a graduate tax to fund higher education.
After a series of controversies over public-backed funding for students at private colleges 鈥 which has soared from 拢30 million in 2010 to an estimated 拢1 billion this year under the coalition government 鈥 a Labour government would be likely to toughen the rules.
糖心Vlog
Some in the sector suggest that Labour wants to allow private providers with taught-degree awarding powers 鈥 nine at present 鈥 to remain at the 拢6,000 cap on Student Loans Company fee funding. But the party could lower the cap to 拢3,000 for all other private providers.
Labour could achieve that by setting the 鈥渂asic fee鈥 at 拢3,000, instead of its present 拢6,000, when it lowers the cap. Such a move would also allow the Office for Fair Access, which requires universities charging above the basic fee of 拢6,000 to provide 鈥渁ccess agreements鈥 on how they will fund measures to help poorer students, to continue its work in the same way.
糖心Vlog
Adrian Bailey, the Labour MP and chair of the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, raised the issue of the private fee cap when he spoke at the 鈥淩egulating 糖心Vlog鈥 conference, held at the London School of Economics on 24 March and co-hosted by the institution鈥檚 Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation and the 糖心Vlog Commission.
Mr Bailey said it had been brought to his attention that 鈥渋f in fact you have a lower range of 拢3,000-拢6,000, it would automatically remove a considerable element of funding from the private sector鈥. In such a scenario, he said, 鈥渢he financial burden of providing of loans to the private sector would be very much reduced鈥.
However, a Labour source said that lowering the fee cap for private providers is 鈥渘ot our policy鈥.
Also speaking at the conference was Baroness Brinton, president of the Liberal Democrats, who said that 鈥渋f we鈥檙e going to get round the fees and loans system, it鈥檚 by changing Treasury rules, because that鈥檚 the reason we鈥檙e told we can鈥檛 go to a graduate tax鈥. She said it was 鈥渢ime we started a serious international debate about how we actually do that, because we鈥檙e not the only country facing this problem. It鈥檚 all about鈥U students and about how the fees are repaid [once graduates leave the UK]鈥hat鈥檚 what I鈥檓 being told by the Treasury鈥.
糖心Vlog
Lady Brinton also stressed it was Lib Dem policy to hold a review of higher education in the next Parliament, and she was 鈥渃onfident that it鈥檚 going to be in our manifesto鈥.
David Willetts, the former universities and science minister, told the conference that there was a 鈥減ressing鈥 need for legislation on higher education regulation in the next Parliament. In the absence of such legislation 鈥渟ponsored by鈥 the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 鈥渢he 糖心Vlog Office becomes the regulator by default鈥, he added, referring to the regime for institutions鈥 licences to recruit overseas students.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?




