Source: Alamy
Causing protest: many Lib Dem MPs broke pledge to oppose fee rises in 2010
The Liberal Democrats have reached a 鈥渃redible position鈥 by accepting 拢9,000 tuition charges in the short term and treating the abolition of fees as a future aspiration, according to the party鈥檚 deputy leader, Simon Hughes.
The Lib Dems, who again could be power brokers in any future coalition, reached a compromise over their official policy on higher education funding at the party鈥檚 autumn conference in Glasgow on 15 聽September.
Senior Lib Dem figures had originally proposed a motion that backed 拢9,000 fees and committed the party to 鈥渞etaining the current system of higher education finance鈥.
糖心Vlog
But that was thrown out by delegates, who supported an amended motion.
The changed wording accepts that the 拢9,000 regime is 鈥減referable鈥 to Labour鈥檚 policy, adding that the Lib Dems will review the system after the 2015 general election and then scrap fees 鈥渋f possible or necessary鈥.
糖心Vlog
Vince Cable, the business secretary, ended up backing the amended motion while disagreeing with the goal of abolishing fees.
鈥淲e and the other major parties are not going to go back to free tuition,鈥 he told delegates. 鈥淓ven if a party promised it, I don鈥檛 think the public would believe it.鈥
The Lib Dem leadership wanted to update the party鈥檚 official policy, which until now stated that it would phase out tuition charges 鈥 problematic given that many of the party鈥檚 MPs broke their pledge to oppose fee rises in 2010.
Mr Hughes, who took on the role of 鈥渁ccess champion鈥 in 2011, told Times聽糖心Vlog after the debate: 鈥淭he party still has a strong anti-fees view.
鈥淲e are trying to be realistic: fees聽have been implemented. We鈥檙e saying that rather than try and go back to where we were [abolishing fees] immediately, let鈥檚 pause, reflect, take evidence, see the effect and then come back to it again in the round after the election. I think that鈥檚 a聽more credible position.鈥
糖心Vlog
Mr Hughes said that on access, it was 鈥渘ot the fees鈥ut the funding for living costs that is the real issue鈥.
As a result of the vote, the Lib Dems are likely to have a short-term higher education funding policy close to that of the Conservatives at the next election.
Labour, which in 2011 unveiled a holding policy promising to lower fees to 拢6,000, must now weigh up whether maintaining a different stance will attract enough votes to balance the higher costs of implementing such a system.
糖心Vlog
Julian Huppert, the Lib Dem MP聽for Cambridge, who voted against 拢9,000 fees in 2010, told the conference that he wanted 鈥渁n option to eliminate fees鈥 kept for consideration by the party in the longer term.
But he added: 鈥淚 really don鈥檛 think the public would believe us if we said it at the next election.鈥
The original motion proposing support for the 拢9,000 system was the fruit of a Lib Dem working group on post-16 education policy.
Baroness Brinton, who chaired the working group, criticised the party鈥檚 former policy to abolish fees. 鈥淲e had no method for paying for it,鈥 she told a Million+/National Union of Students fringe event at the conference on 15 September.
糖心Vlog
She added: 鈥淭he group鈥檚 position was: we quite like the current system provided we get more support for聽students from lower-income backgrounds.鈥
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?




