ÌÇÐÄVlog

Indifferent responses to student enquiries ‘costing enrolments’

Applicants to UK and Australian universities generally have a better time dealing with ChatGPT, ‘mystery shopper’ study finds

Published on
October 1, 2026
Last updated
October 1, 2026
Yawning student illustrating boredom studies
Source: iStock

Universities are losing enrolments because they neglect the “fundamentals� of customer service, research suggests.

A “mystery shopper� study has found that staff in Australian and UK universities generally perform worse than ChatGPT in making would-be students feel valued.

The Enquiry Experience Tracker study, conducted by education consultancy Edified and student recruitment specialists UniQuest, found that almost two in three prospective students were “left unconvinced� after their approaches to universities drew largely generic responses.

The study, the sixth of its kind and the first to focus on domestic rather than international student admissions, saw about 700 enquiries lodged to 30 institutions in Australia and 33 in the UK by six fictitious “personas� – including a high school student, a career changer and a parent – through media including phone, chatbots, web forms, Instagram and prescheduled phone or video consultations.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Only 37 per cent of enquiries drew responses that made the student impersonators keen to persist, the exercise found.

Universities are squandering “prospects� through indifferent rather than bad service, the study found. While only 15 per cent of the enquiries elicited no response at all, many left the simulated shoppers feeling alienated by piecemeal and impersonal answers.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

“Students aren’t walking away because they got bad information,� said study director Elissa Newall. “They’re on the fence because universities don’t give them enough confidence to take the next step. Warmth and a properly tailored answer show that you value the student, and in both Australia and the UK, too few institutions are consistently getting that right.�

The study found that one-third of universities’ initial responses failed to fully answer the enquiries, and only half conveyed an impression of warmth and approachability. Fewer than half of enquiries elicited follow-up communications.

Yet personalised contact has a rich payoff, the study found. Shoppers proved seven times as willing to continue engaging when they received tailored instead of pro-forma replies, while follow-up almost guaranteed continued interest from the prospective students.  

“Institutions lose momentum the moment a prospect needs nurturing rather than answering,� said Jennifer Parsons, UniQuest’s chief market and partnerships officer. “Sustained engagement doesn’t happen by chance. It takes the right systems and journeys working behind every channel, so no qualified student is left to drift away.�

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The mystery shoppers also lodged almost 200 enquiries about universities with ChatGPT instead of universities, and mostly found the experience preferable. Artificial intelligence presented as quick, comprehensive, direct, structured, “confident� and more likely to provide a “genuine reason to choose the institution�.

“AI is often making a more compelling case for universities than their own responses do,� the says.

Newall said students were already using AI to choose universities. “The opportunity for enquiry teams isn’t to compete on speed or information,� she said. “It’s to make sure that the student who takes the step to reach out feels like a person, not a ticket.�

The study found that traditional enquiry channels were viewed more favourably than newer ones, with email and phone eliciting satisfaction rates of 87 per cent and 78 per cent respectively, compared with 72 per cent for webchat and 64 per cent for Instagram. One-fifth of Instagram enquiries went unanswered.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Prearranged one-to-one consultations proved most satisfying of all, but only 12 per cent of UK institutions offered this service, the study found.

Deakin University was deemed Australia’s highest-performing institution while the University of the Arts London topped the UK results.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

It starts with calling it "customer service", then so-called "mystery shoppers" (who are not prospective students, so not representative) wasting the time of uni personnel during an extremely frantic period of the year, on a non-representative sample, and a comparison to ChatGPT which is a consumer product and can be prompted any odd way. A "study" without usefulness other than another headline slagging off universities. Do better, THE!
This bit interested me: 'presented as quick, comprehensive, direct, structured, “confident�....' The article also mentioned "warmth and approachability." These map pretty well to the Assurance* and Empathy dimensions of the SERVQUAL model. It should be seen less as an indictment of current practice than as an opportunity to support and train customer-facing people in admissions better. Customer-facers are incredibly important...and in too many cases incredibly neglected. *AI is very good at Assurance owing to its speed and ability to "remember" fiddly detail. However, it can also deliver absolute/hallucinatory codswallop with equal assurance, so it must be watched closely indeed.
new
Students are not customers, and universities should not be run like businesses. That mindset is concerning.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs