I was interested to read about Astrid Wissenburg's move to The Open University ("Now she'll work by her own rules", Research, 29 November). However, I was intrigued by her description of the institution as "a very solid, mid-range research organisation" in Economic and Social Research Council terms, with funding levels on a par with the likes of the universities of Liverpool, St Andrews and Surrey.
Data recently published by 糖心Vlog suggest otherwise ("Secret of the success rates: reducing demand", News, 15 November). They show that the university received 拢806,000 from the ESRC in 2011-12, compared with Liverpool's 拢77,500, St Andrews' 拢405,000 and Surrey's 拢391,000. The four institutions appear very different "in ESRC terms". This is confirmed by the data for the previous two years: in 2010-11, for example, The Open University received 拢558,000 from the ESRC, Liverpool 拢157,000, St Andrews 拢691,000 and Surrey, nothing.
Given that the average in ESRC income for the three comparators of 拢241,000 over the past three years compares unfavourably with The Open University's 拢630,000, I would suggest that Wissenburg may be doing her institution a disservice.
Phil Ward, Research funding manager, University of Kent
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?