糖心Vlog

Interview with Bernard-Henri L茅vy

The philosopher on coming face-to-face with death in Bangladesh, why academics don鈥檛 like him, and Brexit

Published on
May 24, 2018
Last updated
May 24, 2018
Bernard-Henri L茅vy
Source: Jean Christophe Marmara/Figarophoto

Bernard-Henri L茅vy studied philosophy at the 脡cole Normale Sup茅rieure and briefly taught in universities before becoming one of France鈥檚 best-known 鈥 and often controversial 鈥 public intellectuals. He is the author of numerous books, including The French Ideology, Who Killed Daniel Pearl?, American Vertigo: Travelling America in the Footsteps of Tocqueville and Left in Dark Times: A Stand against the New Barbarism. On 4 June, he will be performing his one-man play, , at Cadogan Hall in London.

Where and when were you born 鈥 and where did you grow up?
I was born in Algeria, then a French 诲茅辫补谤迟别尘别苍迟, in 1948, in a village I left immediately afterwards. After that, I was essentially brought up in Paris.

How has this shaped who you are?
I am unusual in having no clear image of my place of birth, since I never lived there. I imagine that must have had an impact on how I conceive the world. I also think it had an influence on the anti-naturalist, anti-organicist philosophy I developed later, which gives no credence to the worship of roots or anything like that.

What kind of undergraduate were you?
Both hard-working and unruly. I tried to be top of the class and yet not to miss out on that marvellous intoxication to be found, for example, in the discovery of love.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

What was your most memorable moment at university?
The moment when I escaped and followed the call of [French novelist and politician] Andr茅 Malraux to go to Bangladesh, which [in 1971] was fighting for its independence and to put an end to a genocidal bloodbath unparalleled since 1945. I had passed the 补驳谤茅驳补迟颈辞苍 [competitive examination] in philosophy, but suddenly felt closer to 鈥渁dventurers鈥 in the mould of George Orwell or T.聽E. Lawrence than to traditional philosophers such as Sartre or Wittgenstein.

Can you divide your life into a 鈥榖efore鈥 and an 鈥榓fter鈥?
Yes, that time in Bangladesh. I saw things there that a young man should never witness and which mark him for ever: corpses, people dying of hunger, the worst things that man can suffer at the hands of his fellow man. Absolute evil. All my work and publications come out of that.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

For how long were you active as a teacher?
Not long. Two years. I taught epistemology at the University of Strasbourg and gave a course on Nietzsche鈥檚 politics at the 脡cole Normale Sup茅rieure.

Why did you give up university teaching?
There was no particular reason. Chance. A desire for adventure or at least to do something new. And meeting Fran莽oise Verny, the central figure in French publishing, who gave me an opportunity to work alongside her.

Do you still have close links with any particular academic institutions?
No. Some Israeli universities have given me honorary doctorates. But that鈥檚 about it. In France, I鈥檓 a pure product of the university system, but I am detested by the academy. Why? Because I got away, try to write for a broad readership and write in the first person.

What you feel about academic critics who have drawn attention to errors in your books?
There are no books聽that don鈥檛 contain errors, particularly when one writes a lot and with a sense of urgency. That urgency is not just a personal whim but a response to the suffering and tragedies of the world 鈥 and those, alas, don鈥檛 wait for anyone.

What is the role of intellectuals in combating the rise of populism?
Showing that there are questions聽that shouldn鈥檛 be asked [because they already have populist assumptions built into them]. The question of Brexit, for example, should never have been asked.

What was your immediate feeling on hearing the Brexit result?
That Great Britain was going to become little England. And that the whole of Europe was inevitably going to lose one of its most powerful engines. Europe is Athens, Rome and Jerusalem, of course. But it鈥檚 also a vision of an open, liberal and democratic society聽that is essentially English in its origins and development.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

What has led you to take to the stage and perform a solo show in English?
The insistence of my friend Sophie Wiesenfeld, who runs the Hexagon Society in London. She saw H么tel Europe, an earlier version of Last Exit聽before Brexit, in Paris in 2014 and realised that I was predicting the almost inevitable collapse of the European project. [After the Brexit vote], she called me up and said 鈥痴辞颈濒脿, your prediction was right. Now let鈥檚 try聽to reverse the trend and help the democrats of Great Britain fight back against the black tide of populism.鈥

What do you hope British audiences will take away from the show?
I hope to contribute to reopening the debate about Brexit and to put over my deep philosophical conviction that nothing is ever final, that one can always put right the errors of the past and change course. In other words, I don鈥檛 believe Brexit is predestined and, to be absolutely honest, I鈥檓 not sure that it is going to happen.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

How can intellectuals help shape the future of Europe?
There鈥檚 one point we should concede to the honest Brexiteers: a Europe without its soul, an accountant鈥檚 Europe so bureaucratic it resembles the Austro-Hungarian Empire, a Europe聽that accommodates itself to jihadism and [allegedly progressive forms of Islam] 鈥 that Europe has had its day. It needs to regenerate itself and go back to the lessons of Dante, Goethe and [German philosopher Edmund] Husserl, of Byron at Missolonghi and Churchill鈥檚 speech in Zurich [calling for 鈥渁 United States of Europe鈥漖. And for that, yes, we need intellectuals.

Tell us about someone you have always admired.
Churchill. His strength of spirit, his courage, his sense of fun. The poetry of his personality. And the fact that, without him, France would not be France, Europe would not be Europe and I might never have been born.

matthew.reisz@timeshighereducation.com


Appointments

Benoit-Antoine Bacon has been appointed president of Carleton University in Ottawa. He will join on 1聽July from Queen鈥檚 University in Kingston, where he is provost and vice-principal (academic). He will succeed Roseann Runte, who left in March 2017 to lead the Canada Foundation for Innovation. Alastair Summerlee has been interim president since July. Professor Bacon, who has also held leadership roles at Concordia University and at -Bishop鈥檚 University, said that he intended to work with 鈥渢he whole community to leverage Carleton鈥檚 many outstanding strengths and to further enhance the institution鈥檚 relevance and impact nationally and internationally鈥.

Frances Bowen will be the new pro vice-chancellor for social sciences at the University of East Anglia. She will join in September from Queen Mary University of London, where she is now dean of the School of Business and Management and professor of innovation. Professor Bowen has previously taught at the University of Sheffield and the University of Calgary, where she served as associate dean for research. David Richardson, UEA鈥檚 vice-chancellor, said that Professor Bowen had a 鈥渨ealth of experience that will help UEA to fulfil its vision and plan in the coming five years鈥.

Siladitya Bhattacharya is to be the head of Cardiff University鈥檚 School of聽Medicine. Professor Bhattacharya was formerly professor of reproductive medicine at the University of Aberdeen, where he also served as the director of its Institute of Applied Health Sciences.

Patrick Parkinson has been named the head of the University of Queensland鈥檚 T鈥塁 Beirne School of Law. Professor Parkinson, a family law and child protection specialist, joins from the University of Sydney, where he had been head of the law school.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Lucy Hodson has been appointed to the role of director of planning and intelligence at Birmingham City University. She will join from Aberystwyth University, where she is currently director of planning and governance.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

The Wolfson History Prize-nominated professor discusses how China鈥檚 past shapes its nationalism and why the Communist Party鈥檚 鈥榟istorical nihilist鈥 label suits him

26 April

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT