糖心Vlog

Predatory points

Published on
August 17, 2017
Last updated
August 17, 2017

The 10 August issue of 糖心Vlog had two articles the same topic 鈥 predatory journals. One, by Roger Watson (鈥Fight fraudulent journals鈥, Opinion), offers suggestions to universities on how to educate academics about the dangers of predatory journals and suggests the need to consider penalties if academics refuse to take the advice offered.

The other article (鈥Beall: 鈥榮ocial justice warrior鈥 librarians are 鈥榖etraying鈥 academy鈥, News) offers Jeffrey Beall a platform to promote his weird, evidence-free claim that librarians refuse to recognise the dangers of said journals (simply untrue), and that their motivation for this imaginary approach is their political bias against profit-making publishers.

Librarians鈥 primary interest is not politics but rather cost-effective provision of information to their patrons, and they understandably dislike the monopoly hold of publishers such as Elsevier, whose net profit margins make the likes of Apple or Amazon jealous.

Charles Oppenheim
Visiting professor at several UK universities


Send to

Letters should be sent to:聽THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in聽糖心Vlog聽should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT