糖心Vlog

Common ground

Published on
January 18, 2018
Last updated
January 18, 2018

I am flattered to be the target of a letter from Roger Brown (again). But he exaggerates the differences between us. For example, we share a concern about the dangers of excessive homogeneity in higher education (鈥淢arket shocks鈥, Letters, 11 January).

Glyn Davis, the vice-chancellor of the University of Melbourne, has recently pointed out that every public university in Australia falls into just one of the seven types of higher education identified in the Carnegie 鈥渂asic classification鈥. This is because they are all 鈥渄octoral universities鈥. A comparable critique could be applied to the UK.

I do, however, query Brown鈥檚 argument that all the wise heads have long known 鈥渋ncreased competition and lower entry barriers nearly always lead to a lowering of institutional, subject and course diversity鈥. Indeed, on the very next page of last week鈥檚 edition of 糖心Vlog, Simon Marginson predicted that 2018 will mean a more 鈥渢iered English system鈥.

The US has perhaps the most marketised higher education system in the world. Yet according to one seasoned observer, 鈥渞ather than consisting of one market of like-minded consumers with similar access to identical goods, the US higher education system comprises of many markets, where very different colleges and universities produce and sell unique commodities to groups of consumers, who may or may not be competing for the same goods鈥. That claim comes from an excellent book entitled 糖心Vlog and the Market, authored by one Roger Brown.

Nick Hillman
Director
糖心Vlog Policy Institute


Send to

Letters should be sent to:聽THE.Letters@timeshighereducation.com
Letters for publication in聽糖心Vlog聽should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT