It is unfortunate that Stuart Wrigley鈥檚 attempt to argue that 鈥渢here is no聽such thing as critical thinking鈥 betrayed a significant lack of critical thinking (鈥The write way to聽think鈥, Opinion, 4聽January).
His initial judgement that the concept of critical thinking 鈥渋s just a tautology鈥 is based on the claim that 鈥渢hinking encapsulates being critical鈥. This judgement requires that there is no such thing as poor thinking 鈥 that is, no jumping to conclusions, framing and anchoring problems in decision-making, confusing cause and correlation, circular and ad聽hominem arguments, straw men, confusing necessary and sufficient conditions, and so on. His claim that 鈥渕ost sentient human beings think well enough鈥 is based, in large part, on his overhearing students in a queue at a聽college cafe discussing the best way of getting from one place to another.
All this is disturbing enough but Wrigley鈥檚 argument then goes on to demonstrate a further significant lack of critical thinking. For one thing, if the concept of critical thinking is tautological, given that 鈥渢hinking encapsulates being critical鈥, why is not the term 鈥渃lear and logical thinking鈥 also tautological, though it is a聽quality that Wrigley wants students to develop? In addition, why does he commend academic writing courses for their ability to聽teach students to 鈥渟tart thinking better, often with startling results鈥, given his assertion that we already 鈥渢hink well enough鈥 (prior to such courses)?
The value of critical thinking has been very well documented in many reports and research studies for many years. Quite simply, we聽can become better at analysing and evaluating reasoning, at productively focusing on interpretation of meaning, at solving problems by focusing on their content, at being creative in developing alternative explanations and hypotheses, and at producing coherent, clear and persuasive argumentation. In short, we can become better at doing these (and other things) by developing and reinforcing our skills in critical thinking in various ways, including by receiving explicit instruction in them.
Roy van den Brink-Budgen
Director
If鈥hen Ltd
Send to
Letters should be sent to:聽THE.Letters@timeshighereducation.com
Letters for publication in聽糖心Vlog聽should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?