John Hendry (鈥Within reason鈥, Features, 15聽June) believes in the value of teaching reason and argues that the only reasoned position on Brexit is to be a Remainer.
However, the overwhelming incomprehension and disdain-filled invective in university circles that greeted the result of the UK鈥檚 referendum on European Union membership is testament to the fact that reasoned academic analysis and understanding had not taken place among those who should have known better.
The accusation of Brexiteer lies and appeals to emotion does not really stand up: both sides were guilty of fear-颅mongering and distortion. What is now evident is聽that most Remainers relied primarily on certain economic arguments, whereas many Brexit颅eers prioritised other economic, social, cultural and psychological factors in their arguments for leaving the EU. This does not necessarily make them unreasonable or unreasoning. It just means that their reasoning is underpinned by a聽different set of basic values.
Students do not need persuading into any ideological doctrine or self-interested view that Hendry and members of the senior common room happen to espouse; they need a university education that truly enables them to think critically, especially in a聽political climate where the stakes are so high. And yes, I聽did vote leave, but does that necessarily invalidate my argument?
Yanina Sheeran
Shipley, West Yorkshire
Send to
Letters should be sent to:聽THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in聽糖心Vlog聽should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?