糖心Vlog

Higher education must wrestle harder to escape ChatGPT鈥檚 death grip

Unless something is done, teaching and learning risks becoming a completely inauthentic spectacle, says Dan Sarofian-Butin

Published on
August 15, 2023
Last updated
August 15, 2023
Brock Lesnar in action vs Samoa Joe during match at Barclays Center,  Brooklyn, NY, in 2017
Source: Chad Matthew Carlson/Sports Illustrated/Getty Images

In just a few weeks college students will be returning to campus. That is when the world will end.

I am exaggerating only slightly. I believe that this coming semester will be a tipping point as professors struggle with and ultimately succumb to all that ChatGPT has unleashed.

In his 1957 essay 鈥溾, Roland Barthes presciently noted that 鈥渢he public is completely uninterested in knowing whether the contest is rigged or not, and rightly so; it abandons itself to the primary virtue of the spectacle鈥; and in this spectacle, 鈥渨hat the public wants is the image of passion, not passion itself鈥.

While this might be relevant to World Wrestling Entertainment executive chair Vince McMahon (or ), you say, what does it have to do with the death of the college classroom?

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Everything.

We have to begin by acknowledging an ugly truth: we have long known that going to college has only a connection to learning. Of course students learn; we鈥檙e just what they learn, how deeply they learn it, or whether they learned it from us. Rather, higher education, as any good social scientist will tell you, serves a signalling function in our society through . It鈥檚 an open secret, for example, that the 鈥溾 (when individuals with an academic degree earn more than otherwise comparable individuals without such a degree) is alive and well.

But until recently, we have all put up the good fight: I demand that students learn, and students more or less grudgingly acquiesce. Sometimes I yell a little louder, or try a new technique, or change my reading list. And sometimes students surprise me with their efforts, or maybe lack thereof. But we all accepted the of teaching and learning because, well, what else was there to do?

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

And then the world changed at the end of 2022 with the release of ChatGPT. Within six months we have seen ChatGPT鈥檚 output , ace the and a dozen different advanced placement courses, and make it through the first year at . And with all due respect to Noam Chomsky 鈥 who ChatGPT was 鈥渟uperficial and dubious鈥 and its output 鈥渓inguistic incompetence鈥 鈥 he and all the other haters out there have no clue. ChatGPT is a 鈥溾 able to easily mimic and manipulate linguistic forms to the extent that have a hard time differentiating the real from the fake.

This is how the world will end.

Namely, using ChatGPT allows any and all students to submit decent written work on any academic subject, in any format, in any style, with the press of a . Until now, we have always assumed that students鈥 written work served as a summary and synthesis of, and thus a proxy for, the process of learning. But ChatGPT鈥檚 ability to mimic such writing shreds that implicit relationship.

My feedback on students鈥 papers 鈥 鈥渢his is an elegant phrasing鈥; 鈥渆xpand this some more鈥; 鈥淚 appreciate how you incorporated this idea鈥; 鈥淚 think you are conflating two distinct issues鈥 鈥 becomes meaningless. Or, more precisely, the submission and grading of students鈥 work will become an exercise in 鈥渢he image of passion, not passion itself鈥. What we used to think of as teaching and learning may become as inauthentic a spectacle as the wrestler Stone Cold Steve Austin putting a death grip on John Cena. I will pretend to teach and you will pretend to learn.

Dear reader, we must move through the stages of grief if we are to come to terms with and confront this coming reality. We cannot pretend that ChatGPT does not exist; surveys suggest that anywhere between and per cent of college students admit to using it. And we can鈥檛 bargain our way out of this, somehow thinking we鈥檙e smart enough to catch these freeloaders. It鈥檚 enough to know that OpenAI its detection system (鈥淐lassifier鈥) this summer, basically admitting that the company couldn鈥檛 reliably detect the output of its own product; if they can鈥檛 do it, neither can you.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

I鈥檝e said it before and I鈥檒l say it again: we must accept and embrace ChatGPT in the college classroom.

There are many ways to do so. I, for example, am making ChatGPT my formal TA in my classroom this autumn, such that students will have to consult with it in every class and for every assignment. The American Psychological Association has its own , and there are oodles of other out there.

We, of course, don鈥檛 have this all figured out yet. But we have to do something, when our students return, to extricate the college classroom from Stone Cold ChatGPT鈥檚 all-too-real death grip.

Dan Sarofian-Butin is professor of education and founding dean of the Winston School of Education and Social Policy at Merrimack College, Massachusetts.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

"Wrestle harder"? "Death grip"? "Stage of grief"? No freshman comp? No editing? All the components of ChatGBT are long established and used by students for years. More and more teachers and professors speak to the constructive uses of AI in teaching. Why does this writer exhibit no awareness of everyday realties? And no ChatBOT cannot replace a human TA, not in real institution of higher education at least.
In response to graff.40's comments. Some teachers and professors indeed speak of the possibility of AI having a positive impact upon student learning, but no evidence yet exists to support such a hypothesis. In the interim, perhaps we should devise more interesting and novel essay topics to which ChatGPT simply cannot effectively respond.
Hyperbole much?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT