糖心Vlog

Warburg Institute court judgment handed down

Both institute and University of London claim success

Published on
November 6, 2014
Last updated
May 27, 2015

Both the University of London and the Warburg Institute are claiming success in a long-running legal battle over the institute鈥檚 independence after a High Court ruling was published.

The Warburg Institute, which holds about 350,000 books in its Bloomsbury library, was originally established in Hamburg in 1900 by Aby Warburg, a Jewish intellectual.

The collection of about 80,000 books were shipped to London in 1933 to escape destruction by the Nazis and were accepted by the University of London under a deed of trust in 1944.

However, tensions between the university and the Warburg, regarded as one of the world鈥檚 leading arts and humanities libraries, have grown in recent years since London more than doubled an estates charge on the institute in 2007-08.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The university says the 鈥渟pace charge鈥 鈥 which it says rose from about 拢8,000 in 2006-07 to 拢643,000 in 2007-08 - is line with normal full-economic cost principles used by other universities.

However, the Warburg claimed the charge, plus the withdrawal of other funds, made the institute鈥檚 position untenable and was a breach of the 1944 trust deed, which said it should be 鈥渁dequately equipped and staffed as an independent unit鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The two parties were unable to reach an agreement and, following the involvement of the Attorney General and the Charity Commission, the matter finally came to court this year.

In a judgment published on 6 November, Mrs Justice Proudman finds 鈥渢he levying of space charges鈥s not, to my mind, permissible鈥.

The 鈥淯OL only has a right to be indemnified in respect of the actual, properly incurred expenditure on the Institute鈥ot in respect of UOL鈥檚 costs on its other property鈥.

鈥淭he imposition of university-wide space charges flies in the face of this provision as it merely treats the Institute as a constituent part of UOL without regard to its special character or its position as an independent unit,鈥 the judgment continues.

However, she gave the university leave to appeal four separate parts of her decision. It has three months to consult its trustee and decide whether it wishes to take the case, which it says has already cost the university 鈥渉undreds of thousands of pounds鈥, to the Court of Appeal.

Margaret McGowan, chair of Warburg鈥檚 Advisory Council, said after the hearing that it was 鈥減leased to receive the judgment representing years of hard work鈥 and welcomed the judge鈥檚 ruling on space charges.

鈥淲e are frustrated that the university appears to wish to continue to spend its time and money on furthering the legal dispute rather than find a solution to secure the Warburg Institute鈥檚 long-term future,鈥 she added.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Leticia Jennings, of solicitors Bates Wells Braithwaite, which represented the Warburg, said she was pleased the 鈥淗igh Court has rejected the University of London鈥檚 claims that all additions to the Warburg Institute since 1944 belong to the University, and instead agreed that they form part of the Institute鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淔urthermore, the judge鈥eld that the University is obliged to provide funding for the activities of the Warburg Institute.鈥

However, the university claimed the 鈥渏udge has found in favour of the university on almost every point that was of importance to us鈥.

These points include noting that the block grant funding from the 糖心Vlog Funding Council for England belongs to the university, not to the Warburg, and that its governance arrangements are in line with the 1944 trust deed.

Vice-chancellor Sir Adrian Smith said he聽was 鈥渄elighted鈥 to have clarification on the main issues raised before the court.

鈥淭he university has always maintained its desire to preserve the vision of Aby Warburg,鈥 he said.

鈥淣ow, we must look forward, and get back to the task of supporting this unique institute and the academic community who value it so highly.鈥

He denied that the university had ever wanted to split the collection, calling the claims 鈥渨holly unfounded鈥.

鈥淲e are also aware of rumours that there were other interested parties wanting to move some or all of the collection to Hamburg or New York鈥, he said, adding that 鈥渢oday鈥檚 ruling will ensure that we keep the collection in the university here in London鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

Friends: The text of Justice Proudman's decision is available at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2014/3564.html. Cheers, George

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT