糖心Vlog

University of Idaho warns staff against giving abortion advice

Campus cites 2021 state law in telling all employees not to promote abortion, while state鈥檚 other large institution suggests pointing students to outside counsellors

Published on
September 28, 2022
Last updated
September 28, 2022
Arboretum filled with trees helps to frame university water tower in Idaho, USA
Source: iStock

The University of Idaho has warned all staff against giving advice on abortion, at聽the risk of losing their job or imprisonment, saying it feels compelled by the language of a state law enacted last聽year.

The 11,000-student institution, in a聽 addressed to all employees, says that prohibited acts include promoting abortion, counselling in聽favour of abortion, or referring anyone for an abortion.

鈥淭his is a challenging law for many and has real ramifications for individuals in that it calls for individual criminal prosecution,鈥 a University of Idaho spokesman said in explaining the guidance.

The warning nevertheless drew criticism from both abortion rights advocates and free-speech activists, who accuse the university of violating constitutional rights to expression.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淔aculty members don鈥檛 shed their First Amendment rights at the classroom door,鈥 the advocacy group Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or Fire, attributed to a staff attorney, Adam Steinbaugh.

The issue of abortion regained political prominence across the US with this summer鈥檚 Supreme Court ruling overturning the constitutional right to abortion that the nation鈥檚 top court established in 1973.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

That decision has had an especially major impact on higher education, given that traditional students are in the age group where abortion is most common.

Institutions in conservative states such as Idaho, that have moved to tighten abortion rights to near or at allowable limits, have faced predictions they will lose students and top academics. The Supreme Court ruling has also challenged institutions 鈥 especially those providing medical training 鈥 to determine how they now must restrict their teaching and research.

The University of Idaho attributed its new guidance primarily to聽 that prohibits public funds 鈥 covering its state universities 鈥 being used to 鈥減rocure, counsel in favour, refer to or perform an abortion鈥. It made no reference to the subsequent US Supreme Court ruling or the reason for the timing of the guidance.

The state鈥檚 other large research institution, Boise State University, also has issued guidance on the 2021 state law that notes the law鈥檚 language against such actions as promoting abortion or referring anyone for an abortion, and the potential penalties. Both the University of Idaho and Boise State University guidance also emphasise uncertainties about what exactly is allowed and prohibited under state law.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

But the University of Idaho, led by Scott Green, a career business executive with no previous experience in higher education, took a more cautious approach in some areas than that of Boise State, which is headed by a career academic who has put a priority on navigating the state鈥檚 partisan scepticism toward colleges and universities.

The University of Idaho suggested that any employees who 鈥渞egularly interact with students in any fashion as part of their employment鈥 should 鈥減roceed cautiously at any time that a discussion moves in the direction of reproductive health, including abortion鈥. The Boise State University language, by contrast, suggests that 鈥渢he best solution is to refer the student to the university鈥檚 licensed counsellors and medical providers or to outside counsellors鈥.

paul.basken@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT