糖心Vlog

UK鈥檚 for-profit college bosses pocket more than v-cs

Analysis of accounts of institutions receiving public funding reveals large salary, bonus and dividend payouts

Published on
June 21, 2018
Last updated
June 21, 2018
People with gold spray paint on their bodies
Source: Alamy
Golden retrievers: some directors of colleges earn in excess of 拢500,000, despite relatively small student numbers

Bosses of small for-profit colleges in the UK are earning more than the country鈥檚 highest-paid vice-chancellors 鈥 with some pocketing payouts in excess of 拢500,000,聽糖心Vlog聽can reveal.

In an investigation of executive pay at alternative providers of higher education, which received聽拢150 million聽in government-backed tuition fee loans in 2016-17,聽THE聽discovered how:

  • A small London business college paid a 拢500,000 bonus to its director
  • A second business college paid more than 拢2 million in dividends and directors' salaries in just three years
  • A for-profit music school awarded stocks and shares to directors worth 拢2 million last year 鈥 while its owners paid 拢3 million to its top-paid director.

Those running for-profit colleges may even be earning far more than their accounts state 鈥 with education providers often making large payments to unnamed聽consultancies聽or outside companies owned by directors,聽THE聽also found.

As for-profit institutions have not yet been required to release annual financial statements in the same way as聽universities,聽THE聽examined accounts for 2016-17 posted at Companies House by 10 institutions聽which received some of the largest amounts of Student Loans Company funding, and their parent companies.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The highest payouts were made to a director at BPP Holdings 鈥 the controlling party of BPP University 鈥 which paid one director a total of 拢881,000 in 2016-17 and 拢988,000 in 2015-16.听BPP University,聽one of the UK鈥檚 three for-profit universities, also paid its highest-paid director 拢567,000 in 2016-17 and 拢652,000 in 2015-16, separate accounts show. The university declined to comment on the payments or who received them.

The biggest recipient of SLC loans among alternative providers is currently the聽British and Irish Modern Music Institute (BIMM), which took聽about 拢24.4 million of public money in 2016-17 鈥 about 85 per cent of revenue, its accounts show. Its highest-paid director was paid 拢197,103 and a further 拢18,926 in pension payments, while six directors shared 拢805,974 in total that year. However, accounts for its parent company BIMM Topco show 鈥渟hares and loan stock of 拢2,033,314 [were also] due to directors鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

BIMM is owned by Sovereign Capital, a聽private equity聽firm, which paid its highest-paid聽诲颈谤别肠迟辞谤听more than 拢3 million in 2016-17, its accounts show.

Adam Carswell, chief executive of BIMM, said that the eight-campus institution offered 鈥渃hoice, quality and value for money鈥. He said that its 鈥渦nique and differentiated approach鈥 had delivered 鈥渟trong links to the industries, excellent employment outcomes [and] tuition fees considerably lower than those charged by the traditional universities鈥.

Another Sovereign Capital-owned alternative provider, Greenwich School of Management, received almost 拢20 million from the SLC last year, but has yet to publish its accounts for 2016-17. Accounts for the previous year for its parent company, Clipper Group, show its highest-paid director received 拢432,941, including 拢192,756 in severance pay.

The disclosures follow widespread criticism of the remuneration of vice-chancellors at UK universities. The country鈥檚 best-paid vice-chancellor, the University of Bath鈥檚 Dame Glynis Breakwell, announced her retirement last November after months of criticism of her 拢468,000 remuneration.

Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, said that 鈥渇ar greater transparency鈥 was required from for-profit colleges in receipt of public funds, adding that 鈥渙paque financial statements appear designed to confuse and it is often impossible to work out who is being paid what or what for鈥.

For-profit colleges聽that 鈥渄o not even have to conform with the minimum standards of accountability that our universities [do had] managed to stay in the shadows despite [their leaders] being even better remunerated鈥 than聽vice-chancellors, Ms Hunt said, adding that they should be 鈥渟ubject to the same checks and balances as universities鈥.

Some of the biggest payments were made at relatively small London business colleges. Icon College of Technology and Management, in Whitechapel, which had about聽and eight-full time staff among 41 academic staff last year, paid 拢578,270 to its managing director Azizur Rahman, including a 拢500,000 bonus, in 2015-16. Its latest accounts are not yet available, but Mr Rahman, the company鈥檚 sole shareholder and director, told聽THE聽that 鈥渢here were and are ample reserves to make this payment without jeopardising鈥ustainability or the standard of education for our students鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

At the West London College of Business and Management Sciences, in Hounslow, which had聽and 800 students in 2016-17, principal Muhammad Iqbal and deputy principal Muddassar Natt 鈥 also its directors 鈥 were awarded 拢135,000 and 拢67,500 in dividends that year on top of their salaries of 拢123,650 鈥 almost as much as the 拢359,861 paid in teachers鈥 salaries that year.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr Iqbal鈥檚 and Dr Natt鈥檚 dividends were far higher in 2015-16 鈥 拢385,000 and 拢192,500 respectively, while they were paid 拢485,000 and 拢225,000 in the preceding year 鈥 with overall dividends and salaries exceeding 拢2 million over the three-year period. Dr Iqbal told THE that this 鈥渇inancial snapshot鈥oes not represent the history of the college鈥 and 鈥渄irectors and shareholders have only taken dividends in [a] few鈥ears鈥 since its foundation in 2005 鈥渄espite injecting substantial amounts of money in the previous years鈥.

At the聽London School of Science & Technology, its two directors Syed and Hassnain Zaidi were paid a combined 拢179,840 in salaries, while dividends of 拢340,000 were paid to shareholders of the family-owned company, of which Syed Zaidi holds a 75 per cent share, its accounts show. In a statement, LSST said the dividends were 鈥減aid to all the five shareholders of the company鈥.

For-profit institutions in receipt of SLC funds will be required to publish their accounts in the same way as universities in future after they came under the remit of the Office for Students in April.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com


Executive remuneration at 10 largest UK private providers, 2016-17

Institution Remuneration of highest-paid director Total remuneration to directors Student Loans Company money received (拢millions)聽 Student Loans Company-funded students
British and Irish Modern Music Institute (BIMM) 拢197,103 拢805,974, plus shares worth 拢2 million from parent company 24.4 4,183
Greenwich School of Management (GSM) 拢432,941*听 拢736,136 19.9 5,525
London School of Science & Technology Not declared 拢179,840, plus 拢340,000 paid to directors and shareholders in dividends; 拢1.1 million paid to company under common control 5.5 1,434
BPP University 拢881,000; 拢567,000** 拢1.5 million; 拢1.1 million** 5.1 1,054
London School of Business and Management 拢195,000 拢210,000; 拢1.3 million of profit was 鈥渁ttributable to owners of parent company鈥澛燝oldwait 4.5 998
Mont Rose College of Management & Sciences 拢150,000 拢150,000 3.7 1,129
St Patrick鈥檚 International College 拢421,933*** 拢421,933*** 3.7 1,509
London Churchill College 拢90,739 (paid in dividends) 拢90,739; 拢110,145 paid as 鈥渟alaries to spouse of directors鈥 3.3 866
Icon College of Technology and Management 拢578,270 拢578,270 2.6 777
West London College of Business and Management Sciences Not declared 拢123,650, plus 拢202,500 in dividends to two directors 2.0 506

* Paid via Clipper Group, GSM controlling company, includes 拢192,756 severance payment; 2015-16 figures.

** Paid via BPP Holdings聽and BPP University respectively.

*** Includes compensation for loss of office of 拢162,233.

Source: accounts lodged by providers at Companies House.听Figures are for 2016-17 unless where stated; SLC figures denote tuition-fee loans for full-time students.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: For-profit UK college heads paid more than v-cs

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Our annual pay review details v-cs鈥 remuneration, explores the make-up and workings of the governing bodies that set it, and compares the rewards on offer with those of other sectors

22 February

Reader's comments (2)

Terrible! At least with some of the later organisations described in the article there is a degree of transparency about who received the money. A shame that some of the more established institutions 'declined to comment on the payments or who received them'. OfS presumably will follow up on accountability for all.
It is a free for all for these private colleges with little government inspection or oversight. These private college owners have little transparency. The real question is how do they make most of this money, the answer is tuition fees from student finance England and how do they get this, the answer is by registering as many students as possible with little interest in the quality of students, their educational qualifications, any other relevant experience or even English Language skills. This of course means TAX PAYERS MONEY. Anyone who has seen the recent BBC Panorama program, articles in papers like the Guardian and others on individual and groups of private colleges will no what is really happening and it is outstanding that not only did QAA, OfS, BIS and others have not investigated these matters thoroughly but that they have allowed private colleges to have grown and linked courses with the Open University and other mainstream Universities offering anything from HND's to MA programs.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT