Popular discourse has it that public spending on science has been on a downward real-terms trajectory since the incoming coalition government鈥檚 spending review in 2010. However, new figures suggest that it is not as simple as that.
The Office for National Statistics鈥 statistical bulletin , published last week, reveals that total public spending on R&D declined by 拢450 million between 2009 and 2010 in 2013 prices, and by a similar amount the following year. However, spending recovered to 拢10.9 billion in 2013, the most recent year for which figures are available. That figure also happens to be the average annual real-terms spend on R&D since 2002.
The research councils鈥 budget rose from 拢2.5 billion to 拢3.4 billion in real terms between 2002 and 2008 and has held its value since then. Meanwhile, spending by the UK higher education funding bodies has remained largely flat since 2002, rising from 拢2.1 billion to 拢2.3 billion between 2002 and 2013.
Stephen Curry, professor of structural biology at Imperial College London, speaking on behalf of the executive committee of grassroots pressure group Science is Vital (of which he is聽vice-chair), said聽that a damaging real-terms fall in the flat-cash resource budget 鈥 which funds science projects 鈥 was invisible in the figures because of a stream of extra capital investments announced by the chancellor, George Osborne, since 2010.
糖心Vlog
Kieron Flanagan, senior lecturer in science and technology policy at the University of Manchester, added that it was arguable the inflation rate for leading-edge science ran above the general inflation rate 鈥 although he also noted that 鈥渁 large part of the cost of research is the human resources, and academic scientists have seen little wage growth over the past few years鈥.
Spending on research by government departments other than the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has declined steadily in real terms since 2002, from 拢2.7 billion in 2002 to 拢1.7 billion in 2013.
糖心Vlog
It dropped by 拢300 million between 2009 and 2010, but has since held steady, largely thanks to increases in spending by the Department of Health and the Department for International Development.
However, Dr Flanagan expressed 鈥渞eal concern鈥 about declines 鈥渋n the traditional areas of major government science and technology spending鈥 by departments such as Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (whose spending fell from 拢201 million to 拢141 million between 2009 and 2013), Transport, (拢86 million to 拢44 million) and the 糖心Vlog Office (拢48 million to 拢23 million).
鈥淨uite apart from the often vital public value of such research, done to support policy and regulation鈥, such departments, he said, are often responsible for 鈥渕aintaining very important national capabilities that the research councils don鈥檛 consistently support鈥.
The most dramatic fall in R&D spending since 2002 has been at the Ministry of Defence, whose real-terms budget has dropped from 拢3.6 billion to 拢1.9 billion in 2009 and 拢1.5 billion in 2013.
糖心Vlog
Professor Curry noted that the UK now spends on R&D the lowest proportion of its gross domestic product of all the Group of Eight countries, despite ministers鈥 regular acknowledgement of the quality of UK science and its contribution to growth.
鈥淕iven the evident value of public investment鈥he question has to be why the government is not seeking to invest more in such a productive sector,鈥 he said.
POSTSCRIPT:
Print headline: UK public funding on R&D holds up amid austerity
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?





