糖心Vlog

Two-thirds of Cambridge researchers on temporary contracts

Scale of research precarity at top UK university and its effect on staff laid out in new report

Published on
May 31, 2024
Last updated
May 31, 2024
Cambridge University students  on the River Cam taking part in the cardboard boat race to celebrate the end of exams to illustrate Two-thirds of Cambridge researchers on temporary contracts
Source: Geoffrey Robinson / Alamy

More than two-thirds of researchers at the University of Cambridge are employed on a fixed-term basis, says a new report聽that highlights staff unhappiness with job insecurity, modest pay rises and a 鈥渃ulture of overwork鈥.

Drawing on new internal staff data, the study by Cambridge鈥檚 University and College Union (UCU) branch found that 69 per cent of research staff聽were working on fixed-term contracts, with 13 per cent on contracts lasting 12 months or less.

In some cases, staff contracts were renewed on a recurrent basis, which聽the union said was 鈥渋n contradiction to the university鈥檚 official fixed-term contract policy, which mandates the conversion of fixed-term contracts to open-ended ones upon the second renewal, except in exceptional circumstances鈥.

The 聽also found that the number of fixed-term staff 鈥 both academic and research 鈥 at Cambridge聽was approaching the level of permanent staff. According to data from the 糖心Vlog Statistics Agency (Hesa), were on fixed-term contracts in 2022-23, that number having聽risen steadily since 2014-15.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

A separate staff survey, which drew 135 responses, gave greater insight into the concerns of those on temporary contracts.

One respondent explained how their 鈥渇unding is rolling and renewed every year鈥 but 鈥渋t is often not confirmed until quite late鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淚 often get emails saying that my funding is running out and my leaving date will be a particular day 鈥 this is usually extended before this date, but last year I didn鈥檛 get official confirmation that it was extended until after the date had passed,鈥 they added.

Another researcher who described themselves as having an 鈥渆xtremely distinguished academic career up to this point鈥 said they would be leaving Cambridge soon聽because they were 鈥渟ick of precarious, fixed-term contracts鈥 and did not 鈥渉ave enough savings to keep living beyond my means in academia鈥, citing high rents in the Cambridge area and childcare costs as contributing reasons for their departure.

A migrant researcher added that precarity had a disproportionate impact on foreign employees,聽saying that 鈥渟hort-term contracts are especially stressful for people whose visas are tied to our jobs鈥.

The situation faced by college-based research fellows was also raised, with some living on salaries of less than 拢30,000, which made them 鈥渁mong the lowest-paid researchers in UK higher education鈥, the report says.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the report鈥檚 authors, its findings 鈥渞eveal significant concerns related to casualisation, job insecurity, excessive workloads and inadequate compensation experienced by researchers at Cambridge University鈥.

Describing what they call a 鈥渃ulture of overwork鈥, the study鈥檚 authors point to their survey鈥檚 finding that 62 per cent of staff said they regularly worked more than their contracted hours, and 26 per cent worked more than 48 hours a week.

A university spokesperson said that 鈥渁lthough this survey represents under 3 per cent of research staff, we acknowledge the concerns鈥澛爄n the report and the university was already working to address many of the issues raised.

A review of staff working on fixed-term contracts in 2020-21 had resulted in about 300 staff moving to open-ended contracts,聽while a 鈥渇urther project is under way, working with the trade unions to review the use of fixed-term contracts at the university and the associated guidance鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Work on a new academic career pathway for research staff 鈥渋s in its advanced stages鈥, and was 鈥渋ntended to help make promotion and recognition for excellence fair, equitable and transparent鈥.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Although a solution to the immediate problem, rolling contracts are simply kicking the can further down the road, where is the money for those contracts coming from - at a time when some departments are shedding staff or at risk of closing, adding long-term overheads increases overall financial risk, and might lead to some departments becoming hesitant to approve rant applications with post-docs attached, limiting opportunities for doctoral graduates. Going from post-doc into an academic role might be feasible or some postdocs, however general academic roles are more demanding and not all post-docs might be ready to take the step or have skills in the area that the department needs. Real solutions might require reviewing grant funding and the reliance on post-docs in projects. That too could have consequences for PhD student recruitment and training.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT