糖心Vlog

Two in five universities considering mergers as majority cut jobs

UK institutions look to structural changes to address cost pressures, but warn there is only so much they can do without government support

Published on
May 25, 2026
Last updated
May 25, 2026
Christmas Truce Memorial showing soldiers handshake within a globe, National Memorial Arboretum, Alrewas, Staffordshire, England, UK
Source: iStock/CaronB

Two in five UK universities are open to or are actively considering acquisitions and mergers with other institutions, according to research.

A Universities UK (UUK) survey of聽its members found that financial pressures are leading to significant cuts across the sector, with 79聽per cent of institutions pursuing voluntary redundancies.

Similarly, of the 48 universities that responded to the survey, 79聽per cent have implemented hiring freezes or paused staff recruitment in the past three years.

Changes to courses are also 鈥渨idespread鈥, UUK said, with just under half of universities reporting having reduced their course offering through consolidation (46聽per cent) or course closures (44聽per cent) over the past three years.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Institutions are also considering larger-scale structural changes in response to the financial crisis gripping the sector, with about 40聽per cent saying they were open to or actively considering acquisitions or mergers with other universities in the future.

Cranfield University recently announced plans to become part of King鈥檚 College London by August 2027, while a merger between the universities of Kent and Greenwich is already under way, which will see the institutions become part of one multi-university group.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Collaborative structures, such as federations and alliances, are also popular, with 65聽per cent of universities considering these, according to the survey.

However, UUK flagged that 鈥渟ignificant barriers鈥 to structural transformation remain, including VAT rules that can see universities charged more for sharing services.

Vivienne Stern, chief executive of UUK, said there are 鈥渃learly barriers to what universities can do on their own鈥, with tuition fee uplifts failing to offset cost pressures.

Respondents cited rises in national insurance contributions, changes to international student recruitment and pay and non-pay cost inflation as adding to their financial problems.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淲e are extremely grateful to the government for the tough decision to uplift fees in line with inflation in England and Wales, but as the survey results show, it just doesn鈥檛 go far enough,鈥 said Stern.

鈥淐ourse closures, staff redundancies and reduced research, which ultimately hit students, local economies and national prospects for growth, cannot continue to be the only solution to the sector鈥檚 financial challenges.鈥

Universities continue to call for the creation of a transformation fund through which the government would provide money to support structural change.

鈥淚f the government is serious about driving growth and ensuring that the opportunities that universities create for people all over the UK remain in place, we need smart investment into higher education,鈥 Stern said.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (8)

I am suprised it is not 5 in 5!! They need to get on with it full speed ahead.
Why?
new
Trying to stimulate a debate.
Merging deficit X with deficit Y = deficit Z鈥 which may well be larger than X+Y given s/t restructuring costs which = need for a slug of extra cash to fund the merger - unless merger = instant course/staff reductions and perhaps a bit of asset stripping to sell off campus land IF its location has market value and IF no planning constraints鈥 Meanwhile likely that the VC & SMT of the bigger HEI Z will end up being paid as much as or even more than the 2 VCs/SMTs of X&Y鈥 so no savings there?! Merger no panacea if just the adding together of 2 failed business models.
Certainly some substantial cost savings in sharing services across the two campus such as payroll, finance, HR etc which sould be more effecient. Advantages also in diversification, if the institutions have strengths in different areas. Depends what both bring to the table. Seems a sensible way of proceeding given the consensus view (though not unanimous) that HE sector has over exopanded in recent years and better than the alternatives. Seems tyo me an easier way of managing a reduced demand while potentially developing critical mass in areas that could be strengthened.
Well I am all for this merging. I am rather hoping that my lot will merge with an institutions that is a bit on the, "ahem," more prestigious side of the fence shall we say, and has some plush offices and more salubrious buildings up for grabs!
We are rather worried about the reverse scenario, to be honest.
Will they be mergers or takeovers though, with the asset strippers selling off the silver?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT