糖心Vlog

TPS: universities seek respite from 拢125 million pensions bill

Coming changes to UK higher education鈥檚 second biggest pension scheme will add millions to costs at exactly the wrong time, leaders say

Published on
May 30, 2023
Last updated
June 2, 2023
 A visitor to British Airways i360 Viewing Tower in Brighton standing on the skywalk to illustrate TPS: universities seek respite from 拢125 million pensions bill
Source: Getty

University leaders have called on the Westminster government to help 鈥渃ushion鈥 the sector against impending hikes in pension contributions or they will be forced to cut back on staffing and course provision.

Employers are bracing for a rise in what they have to pay into the Teachers鈥 Pensions Scheme (TPS) from April next year, with an increase of between five and 10 percentage points possible.

Changes are being made to the government-run scheme after a long review of the mechanism for calculating the likely future cost of public sector pension obligations. The Treasury announced in March that 鈥 because of lower official growth forecasts 鈥 employer contributions for all those enrolled would have to go up.

Graham Baldwin, the vice-chancellor of the University of Central Lancashire and chair of MillionPlus 鈥 which represents modern universities 鈥 said, although the final contribution rate is still unknown, every one percentage point increase would cost Uclan 拢700,000.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Overall, 鈥渨e are talking about an increase for us of between 拢3.5 and 拢7 million which is very, very significant,鈥 he warned, adding that he saw the issue as 鈥渙ne of the most significant challenges universities face in terms of funding鈥.

Professor Baldwin said that the increase in TPS costs comes at an already difficult time for universities and the uncertainty was making budgeting for next year very difficult.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The recent nationally negotiated pay award had added 拢9 million to staff costs while the ongoing fee freeze, high inflation and energy costs were聽also contributing聽to financial pressures.

鈥淓very time we move to create some headroom and a financial cushion, something seems to come along that we have no control over that then takes us back to where we were,鈥 he said.

The TPS contribution increases 鈥渨ill mean there are certain things we won鈥檛 be able to do. We will have to reduce costs to come in on budget,鈥 Professor Baldwin added.

TPS is the second most significant pension scheme in British higher education, after the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), which has been the subject of a lengthy industrial dispute after cuts to benefits were implemented in April 2022.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

It is used primarily in post-92 institutions and higher education colleges and covers roughly 110,000 staff who teach more than 1 million students.

At 23.7 per cent, contributions to TPS are already higher than the 21.6 per cent employers pay into USS, with the latter likely to decrease in the coming years.

Steve West, president of Universities UK and vice-chancellor of the University of the West of England, said another hike in contributions would make it 鈥渕uch more expensive for post-92s to employ academic staff compared to those in USS鈥 and he feared 鈥渨e will start to see the sector being pulled further apart鈥.

A 5 per cent increase in TPS contributions would cost聽institutions 拢125 million per year, equivalent to 1,700 academic jobs, he warned. At UWS, he was projecting increases of between 拢5 and 拢7 million.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor West said the 鈥渃ushion鈥 of subsidies was needed to protect university budgets from the worst of the contribution hikes in the short to medium term; as was offered to schools and colleges the last time changes were made.

Otherwise, universities 鈥渨ill be looking at viability of courses and maybe closing them鈥 as well as 鈥渃ertainly looking at staffing levels鈥, he said.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Raj Jethwa, chief executive of the Universities and Colleges Employers Association (Ucea), said a range of institutions would be affected by the TPS changes and 鈥渕any had been struggling before you add in this unforeseen complication鈥.

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

It should not have been 鈥榰nforeseen鈥! It is a gold-plated public sector DB scheme the like of which the tarnished USS once was. USS was unaffordable for the pre-92s, as generally became DB schemes for most employers, and hence the successive benefits reduction. All Us are private sector entities and it is not surprising that the Treasury will not subsidise their pension costs in the way it is doing for State schools (but, obs, not for independent schools). The post-92s, like the independent schools, have been getting a free ride at the expense of the taxpayer - the TPS Party is over!
TPS is not a 'gold plated' DB scheme - it is a CARE scheme, and Universities are not private sector, but charities. If people like Mr Palfreyman really knew the sector, they would appreciate that - and not just push theirusual ideological agenda in comments very few pay attention to (for obvious reasons).
What amazes me is that missing entirely from the conversation is the quality and value of the eduction provided to the students. All that seems to matter is that the pension plans get funded up front. How about the professors get paid a fair wage, in a competitive job market where their performance drives their pay and save that well earned money in a pension scheme that is tax exempt and they can self direct the investment of the funds. They get out what they put in plus what it earns over time it鈥檚 called saving for retirement, it鈥檚 called being self reliant, it鈥檚 called healthy competition that benefits your students. This and any other socialist scheme will never work, it鈥檚 bankrupting organizations all over the world by creating massive unfunded liabilities that don鈥檛 track with revenues in any manner. It鈥檚 economically infeasible in any form.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT