Less than half of the savings from the scrapping of New Zealand鈥檚 鈥渇ees free鈥 system will be returned to tertiary education, in a budget that also transfers more of the cost burden to students.
Documents from the 28 May budget reveal that the government鈥檚 decision to cancel the free tuition scheme, revealed in early May, will save it about NZ$1.04 billion (拢457 million) over the next four years. The bulk of the savings will be diverted into other 鈥減ublic frontline services鈥, with just 15 per cent earmarked for tertiary education.
That money 鈥 some NZ$156 million 鈥 will be spent expanding two programmes largely oriented around vocational education: Trades Academies, which deliver technical qualifications to senior school students, and the Youth Guarantee, which provides foundation training for adolescents and young adults.
The government will also spend an extra NZ$309 million to increase the number of publicly funded places at universities and colleges, and to boost teaching subsidies by 2 per cent. Tertiary institutions will also be allowed to increase their fees by up to 6 per cent, loading an extra NZ$36 million on to the government loan scheme.
糖心Vlog
With these combined concessions costing just over NZ$500 million, the budget changes represent a significant net loss to tertiary education, particularly universities. Meanwhile, with fees set to rise more steeply than subsidies, the balance of costs will shift more towards students.
鈥淚t鈥檚 not a terrible budget for higher education,鈥 said University of Auckland political economist Nicolas Lewis. 鈥淲e鈥檝e had worse. But it鈥檚 certainly not a promising one [and it is] not so good for young people. Students are going to have to lump more and more of [the cost of education] on to borrowing. It鈥檚 a question of intergenerational equity.鈥
糖心Vlog
Lewis, a political and economic geographer in Auckland鈥檚 School of Environment, said the NZ$284 allocated for additional tertiary places was a 鈥減ositive鈥. But it would not be enough to meet rising demand in New Zealand鈥檚 stuttering economy.
鈥淲e have many more students attending universities when there鈥檚 nothing鈥or them in the job market,鈥 he said. 鈥淚t always surprises me that governments don鈥檛 allow for that.
鈥淚 would have liked to have seen a greater recognition of the work that higher education does in absorbing the unemployed.鈥
Finance minister Nicola Willis said the free tuition scheme had failed and the money would be put to better use. 鈥淔ees free did not increase enrolments or completion rates, especially for those from low-income backgrounds,鈥 she told parliament.
糖心Vlog
Policy analysts agree. A recent Auckland University of Technology found little evidence that the scheme had increased participation, improved progression outcomes or narrowed socio-economic gaps. 鈥淪crapping the fees-free scheme may remove an expensive subsidy,鈥 the authors noted in . 鈥淏ut it should not be mistaken for solving the deeper inequalities that determine who enrols in tertiary education in the first place.鈥
Lewis said that by removing the scheme without using the proceeds to benefit students in other ways, the government was signalling that education was unimportant. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think it sends the right message around valuing young people. I certainly don鈥檛 think it sends a message about the value of universities.鈥
The budget introduces no new research funding while cutting NZ$44 million from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and NZ$38 million from the tertiary education section of the Ministry of Education. It also diverts NZ$200,000 in international PhD scholarships to help pay for the ministry鈥檚 analysis of tertiary education funding.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?









