糖心Vlog

Temporary reprieve on private cap despite number control concerns

For-profits welcome delay but may have to get ready for quality assessment, John Morgan writes

Published on
April 4, 2013
Last updated
May 27, 2015

Government plans to leave private providers outside student number caps until 2014-15 have been welcomed as 鈥渧ery fair鈥 by a leading for- profit college, although a charitable provider says the Treasury is 鈥渞ight to be concerned鈥 by the continued lack of controls.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills announced the move on March, in its response to a recent consultation on number caps at private providers. BIS will require such providers to subscribe to the 糖心Vlog Statistics Agency, and the numbers cap for 2014-15 will be calculated using a baseline of each institution鈥檚 2012-13 numbers, with BIS deciding the rate of 鈥渋ncrease or decrease鈥 at a later date.

Unlike directly publicly funded institutions, private providers are not currently limited in the number of students with publicly backed loans they can recruit.

Universities UK said in its response to the consultation that uncontrolled expansion in the private sector 鈥渉as the potential to impact on the sustainability of overall funding to the higher education sector鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The government is also likely to introduce a new designation system for private providers in 2014-15. For the first time, private providers would have to be assessed on quality by the Quality Assurance Agency, and on financial sustainability and governance by the 糖心Vlog Funding Council for England, if they want their students to be eligible for publicly backed loans.

William Hunt, deputy chairman and co-founder of for-profit GSM London - which has more students receiving Student Loans Company funding than any other private provider - welcomed the fact that BIS will not introduce controls until 2014-15. 鈥淚t is what we were hoping for, giving us reasonable time to engage with Hesa, Hefce and the QAA,鈥 he said.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The government鈥檚 response says that 鈥渢o allow for new investment by providers (such as new campuses) where significant prior financial commitments to expansion have been made鈥, it will consider applications for additional student numbers 鈥渙n a case-by-case basis鈥.

GSM London recently opened a new campus at Greenford.

Dr Hunt said: 鈥淭he alternative sector is financed by investors, whereas the state-funded sector is funded by the taxpayer鈥ou need to have growth [in student numbers] to provide investors [with] justification in their investment.鈥

Aldwyn Cooper, chief executive officer and principal of private, charitable Regent鈥檚 College (soon to be Regent鈥檚 University London), said that introducing a cap in 2013 would have been 鈥渜uite impossible鈥 as most offers to students for that year were 鈥渁lready out there鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

With regard to suggestions of tension between BIS and the Treasury over the lack of controls, Professor Cooper said that the Treasury was 鈥渞ight to be concerned鈥.

But he added that all institutions, including publicly funded universities, should be able to 鈥渙pt out of [student loan] designation in particular programmes鈥 so that unlimited numbers of non-publicly funded students could be recruited.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT