糖心Vlog

Sweden mulls law change to fight online hate against researchers

Academics and public health officials quit Covid-19 research or need police protection after attracting threats

Published on
March 1, 2021
Last updated
March 1, 2021
Matilda Ernkrans
Source: Government of Sweden
Matilda Ernkrans, Sweden鈥檚 minister for higher education and research

Sweden wants to change the law to protect scholars against online harassment after it emerged that academics and public health officials had either quit Covid-19 research or had needed police protection because of threats.

The amendment to the country鈥檚 higher education act would guarantee academic freedom in research and teaching.

鈥淚t is a threat to democracy itself if researchers get silenced by hatred and harassment,鈥 said Matilda Ernkrans, the minister for higher education and research, who has proposed the changes.

In Sweden, which has controversially imposed fewer restrictions on social contact during the pandemic than its European neighbours, Covid experts on both sides of the debate have suffered public abuse.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

One researcher who concluded in January that relatively few children in Sweden had become seriously ill because of Covid-19 has stopped researching and speaking out because of the volume of angry messages he was receiving via social media and email, some of which blamed him for Covid-19 deaths, according to the , a聽Swedish medical journal. Jonas Ludvigsson, a professor at the Karolinska Institute, said he had developed insomnia as a result and had chosen to 鈥渓ie low鈥, it reported.

Meanwhile, Fredrik Elgh, a professor in virology at Ume氓 University who supports tougher measures, gets thousands of threatening social media messages a day, reported , while prominent figures from the country鈥檚 Public Health Agency now require police protection.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms Ernkrans had started work on the amendment, which parliament will debate in the spring, before the pandemic, in response to the online harassment of researchers working on politically contentious areas such as immigration, climate change and gender. 鈥淲e could see a year ago that there were threats and hatred against researchers working on these topics,鈥 she told 糖心Vlog.


THE Campus: Netiquette and encouraging good behaviour in online classes


鈥淣ow, researchers in the field of Covid-19 are the ones being hated聽on,鈥 she continued.聽The聽proposed amendment was also a response to a global threat to academic and university independence, she added.

鈥淚t鈥檚 a very important signal. It was important a year ago, but it鈥檚 more important now,鈥 Ms Ernkrans said.

Sweden already has legal protections for the freedom of research, but this change would widen those to include all types of academic freedom, including teaching, explained Marita Hilliges, secretary general of the Association of Swedish 糖心Vlog Institutions (SUHF).

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

But even Ms Ernkrans admitted that the amendment alone could not stop online harassment. 鈥淥f聽course, the Swedish law of higher education itself cannot regulate social media,鈥 she said, instead framing the amendment more as a signal of intent from the government.

Although universities welcomed the change, Professor Hilliges cautioned that 鈥渋t聽won鈥檛 protect against media attacks and social media hate鈥.

Rather, the hope is that the amendment will push universities to better support their academics who encounter a barrage of online anger.

鈥淚f somebody is getting a threat, and it needs to be reported to the police, this should be done,鈥 said Ms Ernkrans. 鈥淭hey need to do more to protect their employees. You have to be able to go to your workplace and feel safe.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The SUHF is surveying academics to get a sense of the scale of harassment, she said.

鈥淏ut of course, this will not be enough,鈥 she acknowledged. 鈥淚t鈥檚 something we will have to keep on working with.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

david.matthews@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Always support free speech, especially in academia. if some idiot wants to e.g. Holocaust deny, or promote eugenice, they will be swiftly ridiculed and rebutted. Surely that is a basic function of academia; truth-detecting, upholding and reinforcing?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT