糖心Vlog

Students turn to AI-powered apps for help with lecture notes

Software that can record and transcribe class talks and discussions is becoming increasingly common, but some fear it could prove detrimental to long-term learning

Published on
June 25, 2024
Last updated
June 25, 2024
Source: iStock/Tomasz 艢migla

Lee Tremblay was concerned when Georgetown University Law Center announced last year that it would be using Otter, an artificial intelligence-powered transcription service, instead of聽relying on聽the human note takers 惭蝉听罢谤别尘产濒补测 had used for the previous two years of聽law school.

鈥淭hey were really excited, and I聽was really skeptical,鈥 said 惭蝉听罢谤别尘产濒补测, former president of聽the Disability Law Student Association. 鈥淚聽tried聽it. I聽hated聽it. And others came to聽me saying, 鈥楾his is聽completely unworkable; you have to do something about this.鈥欌

惭蝉听罢谤别尘产濒补测 for the Georgetown Law Technology Review detailing the actions needed to ensure that the new technology met student accommodations requirements and was ultimately able to switch back to receiving notes from a human note taker.

While the tensions over the transcription apps at Georgetown Law were new at the time, discussions about their use are becoming increasingly common. AI聽recording devices are creeping into the classroom as students become 鈥 and reliant on 鈥 AI in general. With that comes a litany of questions around privacy concerns, consent and the efficacy of taking notes the old-fashioned way versus via robots.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

But despite many of those questions remaining unanswered, students are moving full speed ahead with the devices.

鈥淚t鈥檚 all just now coming to the forefront,鈥 said Marc Watkins, a professor at the University of Mississippi. 鈥淭he real challenge is faculty don鈥檛 know about it, and a lot of the developers are going to social media and selling directly to students, not as a learning aid but as a mechanism to [stop their] listening skills.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

How effective could it be?

But for students such as 惭蝉听罢谤别尘产濒补测, who requested a human note taker as an accommodation, AI聽transcription inaccuracies made what should have been a simpler solution much more difficult in the end.

鈥淚 think everyone should have access to whatever tool works for them; there are people where Otter worked out great,鈥 said 惭蝉听罢谤别尘产濒补测, who graduated law school last year and now works at Legal Voice, an Idaho non-profit organisation that advocates for and protects the rights of women and LGBTQ+ people. 鈥淯nfortunately for the students who it鈥檚 not working for, you shouldn鈥檛 have to spend hours correcting a transcript 鈥 because then it鈥檚 not actually an accommodation.鈥

Most universities offer note takers to students who request the accommodation. The note takers, who are also students, take notes highlighting important and pertinent information covered in class lectures. The notes are then provided to students who were unable to take their own notes and requested the service. In 惭蝉听罢谤别尘产濒补测鈥檚 case, the note taker saved the notes in Dropbox, not knowing which student would be using them, and 惭蝉听罢谤别尘产濒补测 was able to access them.

Professor Watkins served as a volunteer note taker when he was a student at the University of Central Missouri. He said students using the apps to transcribe notes is one thing, but the apps that create flash cards or practice tests based off transcriptions could prove detrimental to long-term learning.

鈥淚f you鈥檙e using AI to listen, synthesise and create flash cards, you鈥檙e basically just listening for the test and then it鈥檚 out of your mind,鈥 he said.

Genevieve Rice, a rising senior at the University of Michigan鈥檚 Ann Arbor campus, is a growing rarity among her classmates 鈥 she takes her notes by hand rather than using a tablet or a laptop. But despite her old-school leanings, she said if there was an AI tool that was freely available, she would gladly use it.

鈥淚鈥檝e found [writing out my notes] helps things stick in my mind a little bit better, but I聽spend so much time taking notes that I聽sometimes can鈥檛 really engage with the class as much,鈥 said Ms聽Rice, an Asian studies major and graphic design minor. 鈥淎nd now if I聽am engaged in the class, then I聽can鈥檛 take notes.鈥

Ms Rice said she would use the AI-generated flash cards and practice quizzes in addition to, rather than as a聽replacement for, her own note-taking.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淚 started making flash cards for vocabulary at the start of this semester, was good for about a week, but then putting extra vocab words into flash-card format became too much of a hassle,鈥 she said. 鈥淚t would鈥檝e been great to have an app for that. It would be an additional learning tool that I聽would otherwise not have access to because of the workload.鈥

Daniel Limma, director of Northwestern University鈥檚 Law and Technology Initiatives, said that beyond the potential efficiency 鈥 or not 鈥 of the AI note-taking apps, privacy was a huge concern. There could be data leaks, and the recordings from lecturers, as well as other students鈥 thoughts during discussion sessions, could be used to train the AI models.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite, or perhaps because of, those concerns, he thinks universities should begin working with the AI transcription companies instead of banning them.

鈥淭here are absolutely tremendous privacy questions. So sure, it would be better if universities figured out what鈥檚 the value [proposition] for students,鈥 he said. 鈥淎nd [they] should think how to integrate the platforms so students use them in a way that鈥檚 responsible and compliant with laws that apply.鈥

What goes into a policy

Many universities any policy on AI use in general, let alone a stand-alone policy for using AI recorders in class. Several law professors stated that they believe the legality of recording in a lecture hall is dependent on the state, similar to recording phone calls; some states require single-party consent, where one member of the party knows a recording is occurring, while other states require both parties to agree to the recording.

Fordham University has not set a hard-and-fast policy on recording, but in September, university officials released 鈥溾 guidelines for using AI note takers, which was specifically focused on the recorders that cropped up on the Zoom and Microsoft Teams apps during the Covid-19 pandemic.

鈥淭he proliferation of these apps showed up, and it was, 鈥極h, cool, we don鈥檛 have to take notes or [meeting] minutes,鈥欌 to 鈥極h, that鈥檚 a concern,鈥欌 said Jason Benedict, chief information security officer at Fordham, who wrote the etiquette and consideration guidelines. 鈥淣othing鈥檚 bad, it鈥檚 not a showstopper, it鈥檚 just things to know.鈥

Mr Benedict classifies the guidelines as 鈥渕ostly common sense鈥: they suggest informing participants, gaining consent and respecting confidentiality. A.聽T.聽Still University, a Missouri medical school, issued , urging faculty and students to alert each other when using a note-taking app and to review the notes with the knowledge that there would most likely be some inaccuracies.

Professor Limma noted that Northwestern鈥檚 policy banning students from recording in a classroom is posted , and faculty members are also encouraged to mention it in course syllabuses. The university also records the lecture portion of courses for students聽 who might miss the class.

Professor Limma said he was generally against banning these technologies, given their potential benefits. He added that even if there was a ban on recording devices, students could much more easily utilise them now than in the past.

鈥淚 can鈥檛 say I鈥檝e noticed people recording. But one of the ethical questions is that it鈥檚 easier to record and no聽one would ever know,鈥 he said. 鈥淵ou have an app on your phone or laptop; it鈥檚 not like someone has a large tape recorder on their desk.鈥

Last month, Professor Watkins wrote a Substack post titled 鈥溾, which detailed the imminent rise of the AI recording apps. He agreed with Professor Limma in opposing a聽banning on them and said they could provide an opportunity for faculty to reflect on potentially necessary changes in the classroom.

鈥淵ou can鈥檛 ban this, but you do want to talk to students about it and focus on your own teaching and learning,鈥 said Professor Watkins, who is also director of the AI聽Summer Institute for Teachers of Writing at Ole Miss. 鈥淚f you鈥檙e only doing lectures, it鈥檚 probably not the best way to teach anyway. If you break into small groups of discussion, have debates, get them involved in active learning strategy鈥hat will be the best thing possible.鈥

This is an edited version of a story that first appeared on .

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

AI tools are definitely transforming how students engage with learning, but they come with their own set of challenges, like the accuracy issues mentioned with apps like Otter. While some students may find AI transcription services useful, it鈥檚 crucial to explore a variety of AI options to find what really fits individual learning styles. There are plenty of best AI apps that can support different needs beyond just transcription: https://www.mobileappdaily.com/products/artificial-intelligence-apps?utm_source=timeshighereducation&utm_medium=om&utm_campaign=mad It's all about finding the right balance between technology and traditional learning methods to enhance the classroom experience.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT