糖心Vlog

Steve Coogan film defames university administrator, judge rules

Actor Steve Coogan faces legal action over the portrayal of a university registrar in his 2022 film

Published on
June 14, 2024
Last updated
June 14, 2024
Tomb of King Richard III, buried at Leicester cathedral of Saint Martin
Source: iStock/Tornadoflight

A film portraying the discovery of聽the remains of Richard聽III could be聽viewed as聽defamatory towards a聽former official at聽the University of Leicester, a聽judge has ruled.

Richard Taylor, formerly deputy registrar of the university, is聽suing actor Steve Coogan and both Path茅 and Baby Cow production companies over his depiction in the film The Lost King, which was released in聽2022. Mr Coogan produced, co-wrote and starred in the film.

The film is told from the perspective of Philippa Langley, one of the figures who led on the discovery of the remains under a Leicester car park in 2012. The real Mr聽Taylor, now chief operating officer at Loughborough University, claimed that his character is portrayed as dismissive and misogynistic towards Ms聽Langley and as having taken credit for her work.

The defendants argued that Mr聽Taylor had 鈥減ublicly exaggerated鈥 the university鈥檚 role in locating the remains and had 鈥渕arginalised鈥 Ms聽Langley鈥檚 role, and that he was, at times, 鈥渦nduly dismissive and patronising鈥 towards her.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

His Honour Judge Lewis ruled in Mr聽Taylor鈥檚 favour on 14聽June, saying the character Mr聽Taylor was portrayed in 鈥渁聽negative light鈥 throughout the film.

鈥淎t no point was he shown in a way that could be described as positive, or even neutral,鈥 the judge writes in . 鈥淭aken together the film makes a聽powerful comment about the claimant and the way he conducted himself when undertaking a senior professional role for a university.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the judge says, he did not believe that a 鈥渞easonable viewer鈥 would come away viewing Mr聽Taylor as misogynistic or disablist, a reference to a part of the film where the character mimics a hunchback.

The judge concludes: 鈥淭he poor way in which [Mr聽Taylor] was depicted as behaving towards Ms聽Langley was contrary to common shared values of our society and would have been recognised as such by the hypothetical reasonable viewer.鈥

This ruling means that the case can now proceed to a full trial.

The University of Leicester previously 聽arguing that the film contains 鈥渕any inaccuracies鈥 and that the production team 鈥渢ook no聽steps鈥 to聽establish the facts with Mr聽Taylor.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淲e understand the portrayal of Richard Taylor in the film does聽not in any way resemble the reality during this period, whilst an employee of the University of Leicester,鈥 a聽university spokesperson said. 鈥淥ur records point to a colleague engaging constructively, collegiately, fairly and professionally throughout the project.鈥

After the film鈥檚 release in 2022, a spokesperson for the film-makers the BBC: 鈥淲e聽stand by our film and Philippa鈥檚 narrative. The university and Richard Taylor have a different narrative, much of which is factually incorrect.鈥

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT