糖心Vlog

Staff-student relationships still permitted, despite guidance

English universities still resisting introducing bans on relationships say they risk putting students in a more vulnerable position

Published on
July 24, 2026
Last updated
July 24, 2026
Source: Getty Images / Juan Leonel

Several universities across England still permit staff-student relationships, a year since a change in regulations pushed institutions towards introducing bans as part of efforts to address sexual harassment.

Analysis by 糖心Vlog聽has found that although most聽institutions have policies explicitly preventing staff forming relationships with people they teach or supervise, 聽University and the聽universities of聽,听,听听补苍诲听聽were among those that have not moved to an outright ban.

A new Office for Students (OfS) condition of registration聽introduced in August 2025 strongly encouraged universities to聽ban relationships but stopped short of instructing them to do so.

Campaigners say that bans remain the simplest way of tackling the 鈥渁buse of power鈥 that could result from such relationships, but institutions holding out argue that it could drive bad behaviour underground and put students in a more vulnerable position.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

All policies聽seen by 糖心Vlog found that relationships are 鈥渉ighly discouraged鈥 by the universities and require staff to report all relationships.

But there are questions over whether this meets OfS requirements that say statements discouraging relationships 鈥渕ay contribute to compliance but will not individually be treated as a step which could make a significant and credible difference in protecting students鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The OfS confirmed to聽罢贬贰听that any policy that simply discourages such relationships was 鈥渦nlikely, on its own, to meet our requirements and we would be concerned where this was the sole approach adopted by an institution鈥.

Bridget Steele, a lecturer in evidence-based intervention and policy evaluation at the University of Oxford, said: 鈥淚t鈥檚 hard to understand why universities aren鈥檛 implementing these bans.鈥

She said it was rare to see a university explain its rationale, 鈥渟o we don鈥檛 really know why鈥.

鈥淭hat leaves us in a place where we have to speculate. It could be because universities don鈥檛 think that the relationships are happening, and if they don鈥檛 think that they鈥檙e happening, maybe then they don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 worth the effort.

鈥淭hey might think that they鈥檙e happening but they鈥檙e not harmful enough to warrant a ban. Then it could also be the case that perhaps they feel that they don鈥檛 have the resources or capability to enforce the bans or don鈥檛 have agreement on how to determine appropriate sanctions if a staff member was to violate the policy.鈥

Anna Bull, senior lecturer in education and social justice at the University of York and a founding member of The 1752 Group, said that if universities still permit such relationships, the question becomes: 鈥淲hat are they doing instead?鈥

Bull said that she would expect universities without bans to be providing other measures to ensure abuses of power are not occurring, such as running anonymous surveys to try聽to capture the prevalence of staff-student relationships, or running professional boundary workshops to remain compliant in preventing sexual harassment.聽

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

But such measures should be considered by all universities, she said, because bans alone are not enough to protect students.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淚 do have concerns that universities are putting in place a ban, and they鈥檙e thinking, 鈥榯hat鈥檚 it, we鈥檙e done鈥, but nothing鈥檚 going to change if you just put a policy in place. There鈥檚 got to be a programme of cultural change across the institution.鈥

The OfS will be running its聽second sexual harassment survey in 2027,听which Bull said should give some indication as to how last year鈥檚 reforms have impacted the sector.聽The first survey in 2025 found that a quarter of students had suffered sexual harassment and a key test will be whether this has been reduced.

When THE asked the聽University of Liverpool about its stance on relationships, a spokesperson said protecting students 鈥渋s our absolute priority鈥.

They said 鈥渋t is our view that a ban on staff-student relationships is both unlikely to stop all such relationships from forming鈥, adding that a ban was 鈥渓ikely to deter their reporting, thereby impeding our ability to protect the student concerned鈥.

鈥淪taff who do form a relationship with a student are required to report this and a range of measures are put in place to seek to protect the student from any abuse of power. We regularly remind our staff and student community that such relationships are strongly discouraged and we have a whole institution approach to encouraging students to report any concerns.鈥

A University of Southampton spokesperson insisted that it has 鈥渞obust policies, support and reporting procedures in place, and [we] continue to strengthen awareness through mandatory training and accessible guidance鈥.

鈥淲e want all colleagues and students to know how to seek support and report concerns confidentially.鈥澛

Essex, Aston and Leeds were approached for comment.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT