糖心Vlog

Research bureaucracy cuts unveiled as UK nears 拢20 billion target

Tickell Review of research bureaucracy broadly welcomed by science department, which says it is on track to meet spending target

Published on
February 9, 2024
Last updated
February 9, 2024
Hand cutting red cloth with scissors

The UK government has announced plans to roll back 鈥渄ecades of research red tape鈥 as it marks the first anniversary of the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT).

In its聽聽to the publication of the full Tickell Review which was also published on 9 February, the department welcomes many of the recommendations from the University of Birmingham vice-chancellor, Adam Tickell, whose report encouraged major UK research funders to standardise processes, cut duplication and improve data collection.

It explains the government is working with funders to standardise application processes and encouraging collaboration to harmonise their approaches as far as possible, and is keen to support funders in developing better ways of collecting, processing and analysing data.

Building on recommendations in the Tickell Review, an聽in January 2022, DSIT notes UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) will deliver a simpler, user-friendly end-to-end funding service for use by all its research councils.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Universities UK is also helping to coordinate the sector response through a working group to identify opportunities to share learning on reducing bureaucracy, it adds.

DSIT adds it is keen to prevent another slow creep of new rules by monitoring and challenging bureaucracy build-up.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Welcoming the report, science minister Andrew Griffith said DSIT was 鈥渃utting back the red tape that too often slows down talented researchers 鈥 freeing them from long periods buried in piles of paperwork鈥.

鈥淧rocesses that have the best of intentions 鈥 ensuring investment goes towards work that can transform our health and well-being and so taxpayers get a bang for their buck 鈥 have led to the unintended consequences of duplication or overly complex application processes,鈥 he added.

Mr Griffith added that the 鈥済overnment and our partners will balance the continued, robust scrutiny of taxpayers鈥 money, with standardising processes and simplifying systems鈥.

Some of Professor Tickell鈥檚 recommendations receive a more equivocal response. On his call for grant application processes to support equality, diversity and inclusion, DSIT remarks that 鈥淯KRI should minimise reporting burdens鈥 and should not go 鈥渂eyond what is necessary to comply with their legal duties under the [2010 Equality] Act鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭his includes the excessive use of Equality Impact Assessments. Burdensome approaches should be avoided,鈥 it adds, stating that 鈥減ublic authorities must not 鈥榞old-plate鈥 their compliance with the Public Sector Equality Duty at the unjustified expense of the taxpayer.鈥

It also noted that any diversity data on gender must not conflate sex and gender, echoing聽by science secretary Michelle Donelan in September on the issue. 鈥淭he government position is that any such collection of gender data should not be conflated with the protected characteristic in the Equality Act 2010 鈥 which is sex,鈥 it notes.

Introducing a system of self-certification for universities with a 鈥渟trong track record of robust assurance鈥 around security risks 鈥 as recommended by Professor Tickell 鈥 would also be 鈥渃hallenging鈥 given the 鈥渆volution of new and contentious risks, or where there are specific security requirements鈥, DSIT says.

In a聽reflecting on DSIT鈥檚 first year of operations, science secretary Michelle Donelan states that 鈥減ublic spending on R&D is at the highest ever level鈥 and the government is 鈥渇ulfilling our commitment to spend 拢20 billion across the next financial year, with every 拢1 of public expenditure leveraging double the amount of private investment鈥 鈥 which would meet a pledge made in the 2022 Autumn Statement. DSIT says that spending levels already stand at 拢19.4 billion.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The government鈥檚 Science and Technology Framework, unveiled last March, had already made 鈥渟ubstantial gains鈥, added Ms Donelan, who explained it had 鈥渟et the approach for each of our five critical technologies, with significant investment that will build UK capability鈥.

鈥淎cross the wider system we continue to focus on cultivating the right environment for these technologies and our science and technology sectors more generally to flourish,鈥 said Ms Donelan.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT