The rapid expansion of private higher education under the coalition government has been a “good thing� and private colleges should be allowed to raise their tuition fees to £9,000, according to a new report.
The report, by liberal thinktank CentreForum, argues that private institutions have been subjected to unfair regulation in comparison with publicly funded universities, and calls for legislation to establish a single regulatory framework across the whole of higher education.
Public-backed funding for students at private providers has grown from £30 million in 2010 to a projected £900 million in 2014-15, in the absence of student number controls and amid concerns about quality at some for-profit colleges.
“There is a growing recognition within government and within the established university sector that the continued growth in alternative provision is a good thing – good for extended student choice and employment outcomes; supportive of the government’s broadening access agenda for HE; and a driver of new and innovative HE provision through the growing range of partnerships and collaborations alternative providers enjoy with the established university sector,� says the report, written by Stephen Lee, Centre-Forum’s chief executive and professor of voluntary sector management at Cass Business School, City University London.
ÌÇÐÄVlog
But it continues that, in the absence of a higher education bill, private providers face a “restrictive regulatory environment that is inequitable and anti-competitive�, citing the introduction of student number controls for the first time this year as an example.
The report’s recommendations include the implementation of an “equitable playing field� between all providers via primary legislation to establish “a revised and single comprehensive system of regulation and administration that embraces all HE providers�.
ÌÇÐÄVlog
Students at private providers are currently allowed to claim a maximum £6,000 annual fee loan, compared with £9,000 for those at publicly funded universities. “Current disparities in tuition fees and loan caps between the established universities and alternative providers should be removed,� says the report. “Their imposition distorts the market and is prejudicial to the principles and practice of fair competition.�
CentreForum says in the acknowledgements to the report that it is “grateful to GSM London and BIMM�, two for-profit higher education institutions owned by private equity firm Sovereign Capital, “for their kind support in this paper�.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡â€™s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
