A seminar has explored how bureaucracy 鈥 鈥渁dvanced capitalism鈥檚 guilty secret鈥 鈥 has been taking over our universities and much of our lives, and how we can fight back.
The event was initiated by Eliane Glaser, senior lecturer in creative writing at Canterbury Christ Church University. Although academics often produced inspiring work, she told 糖心Vlog, 鈥渢hey were also spending increasing amounts of time on form-filling and paperwork that doesn鈥檛 contribute to that fantastic product鈥.
鈥淐ould bureaucracy be advanced capitalism鈥檚 guilty secret 鈥 that it鈥檚 not as efficient as it鈥檚 made out to be?鈥 she asked. 鈥淎nd, if that鈥檚 so, what鈥檚 the function of bureaucracy?鈥
She questioned whether the red tape existed 鈥渢o make us keep our heads down鈥 and said that it smacked of a 鈥減unitive attitude: if you enjoy your work, you should be doing more form-filling鈥.
糖心Vlog
First to take up these issues at the symposium, held at London鈥檚 Institute of Contemporary Arts on 1聽July, were the co-organisers, artists and curators Pil and Galia Kollectiv, who also teach fine art at the University of Reading and elsewhere.
鈥淩aw human potential is forged into human capital through bureaucracy,鈥 they argued. Artists and academics were among the previously independent groups that had now been 鈥減roletarianized鈥 and 鈥渂rought under stricter capitalist control鈥.
糖心Vlog
Mark Fisher, lecturer in visual cultures at Goldsmiths, University of London, recalled experiences in his career 鈥渨here there was no management. It was like Apocalypse Now: 鈥榃ho鈥檚 the commanding officer around here?鈥 I聽was once informed a week into a module that I聽was teaching it. Managers [seem to have] 鈥榖etter鈥 things to do than seeing that courses are actually running.鈥
The real goal of neoliberal managerialism, in Dr Fisher鈥檚 view, was 鈥渢o stop people talking to each other, by breaking up departments and bringing in professional administrators鈥. Although he was all in favour of administrators and managers whose basic roles were troubleshooting and providing support for academics to do their jobs, 鈥溾榩rofessional administrators鈥 are neither professional nor administrators鈥.
Activist David Graeber, professor of anthropology at the London School of Economics, described universities as 鈥渜uintessentially feudal systems鈥 that often operate on the class-based principle: 鈥淚f you have to ask, you shouldn鈥檛 be here.鈥 In many institutions, he said, he had been forced to 鈥渁sk the students about how the grading system works鈥.
Asked for ways to combat bureaucracy, one speaker suggested 鈥渞adical democracy鈥. Dr Fisher proposed that academics should talk to each other, in a form of 鈥渃onsciousness-raising鈥 similar to that pioneered by feminists in the 1970s, since bureaucracy is inevitably 鈥渃onsciousness-deflating鈥.
糖心Vlog
POSTSCRIPT:
Article originally published as: Is red tape about sealing mouths? (9 July 2015)
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?





