At least two universities have revised academic job adverts after pressure from free speech campaigners, marking one of the first tangible effects of new legislation in England.
The adverts聽initially required applicants to explicitly commit to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) principles as part of their applications.
Campaigners say these types of requirements breach the Freedom of Speech (糖心Vlog) Act, parts of which came into effect聽on 1 August, which was designed to protect free speech and academic freedom on campuses. This makes it clear that universities cannot demand that applicants express or support particular values in order to be hired.
At King鈥檚 College London, applicants were asked to submit a statement of 鈥減ast/current experience of supporting student welfare and equality, diversity & inclusion in the higher education context鈥.
糖心Vlog
At Manchester Metropolitan University, the job description required the role-holder to commit to promoting equity in their area and personal conduct, alongside adherence to other institutional values.
Both universities have amended their adverts following interventions by campaigners. Manchester Met stressed the changes were made聽before the new rules came into force after a聽review of recruitment procedures to ensure they are compliant.
糖心Vlog
Abhishek聽Saha, a professor of mathematical sciences at Queen Mary University of London and a founding member of the London Universities鈥 Council for Academic Freedom, told 罢颈尘别蝉听贬颈驳丑别谤听贰诲耻肠补迟颈辞苍: 鈥淭hese incidents show that many universities are either unaware of, or unwilling to implement, the new legal protections for free speech and academic freedom.
鈥淯niversities may rightly demand expertise in particular areas or theoretical perspectives. But they cannot make job offers conditional on agreement with EDI policies or other ideological positions.鈥
Saha聽added that conditioning recruitment on support for EDI or other socio-political agendas risks 鈥渃ompelled speech, restricts intellectual diversity, rewards performative virtue-signalling, and functions as an ideological litmus test鈥.
In guidance on how to follow the new law, parts of which are still to be enacted, the聽Office for Students flagged that 鈥渏ob adverts requiring commitments to political aims鈥澛爏hould be withdrawn.
糖心Vlog
The regulator鈥檚 director for freedom of speech and academic freedom Arif Ahmed said earlier this year that it is 鈥渁bsolutely right鈥 universities support EDI and it is 鈥減ossible to do so in ways that are entirely consistent with freedom of speech duties鈥.
Some universities including the University of Cambridge and Durham University also altered聽recruitment practices before the new rules came in to remove requirements for explicit support of EDI initiatives.
Saha聽said universities that continue to require applicants to demonstrate adherence to particular ideological positions risk breaching the law and undermining academic freedom.
鈥淩ecruitment should be based on expertise and qualifications, not ideological conformity,鈥 he said.
糖心Vlog
King鈥檚 College London were contacted for comment.聽
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?








