糖心Vlog

No student should graduate without being taught AI, leaders told

Universities let students down if they fail to prepare them for the future workplace, LSE conference hears

Published on
April 3, 2025
Last updated
April 3, 2025
Generative AI Apps
Source: iStock/hapabapa

Universities should ensure that all their students learn to use AI as part of their studies or they will leave them unprepared for the future skills market, a conference has heard.

Speaking at the London School of Economics, Ravi Pendse, vice-president for information technology and chief information officer at the University of Michigan, said that universities risk letting students down if they fail to successfully incorporate AI into their teaching.

鈥淚 believe that no student from any institution of higher education should graduate today without at least one core course in AI, or a significant exposure to AI tools,鈥 he said.

鈥淲e would be doing a disservice to our students if we let them聽graduate without this background.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Pendse told delegates at the Global Approaches to Generative AI in 糖心Vlog conference, hosted in partnership with Peking University, China, that it was the 鈥渞esponsibility鈥 of educators to make sure that students are 鈥渆xposed to these tools鈥.

He added that academics also needed to incorporate AI into their own work to keep their research and pedagogy 鈥渃reative鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淲e need to be thinking about how to evolve our pedagogy,鈥 said Pendse. 鈥淚鈥檓 saying this respectfully to all teachers, myself included, but if you鈥檙e teaching the same way that you taught two years ago, five years ago, 15 years ago, or 20 years ago, you have to take a real look at how your pedagogy is evolving, because with AI tools, your pedagogy has to evolve.鈥

Agreeing that AI should be embedded into higher education, Jaeho Yeom, president of Taejae University in Seoul, South Korea, said that 鈥21st-century education should be really quite different from 20th-century education鈥.

鈥淓xplicit knowledge鈥 can now be outsourced to AI and he said that classroom teaching should instead focus on group discussion and 鈥渂ringing out鈥 creative ideas.

Universities have already been asking themselves these 鈥渇undamental questions about what is the purpose of higher education, and what makes good education鈥, said Claire Gordon, director of the Eden Centre for Education Enhancement at LSE.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淗ow do we educate our students to develop the knowledge, skills and disposition to be effective citizens and workers in their future lives? It seems to me that generation AI throws up new questions that those of us working, teaching and researching in higher education have been grappling with for years.鈥

She added that AI raised questions over 鈥渨hat makes a good assessment鈥, but Pendse said that even before AI complicated learning, there was no such thing as a 鈥減erfect assessment鈥 method.

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (11)

" 鈥淓xplicit knowledge鈥 can now be outsourced to AI " what a depressing and misguided statement.
"I believe that no student from any institution of higher education should graduate today without at least one core course in AI ..." ... to inoculate them against the blizzard of hype around the world's stupidest bubble
Taught what--specifically--about AI? Do you have any idea at all? No
Makes perfect sense to those looking forward rather than backwards.
I think they all know about it already don't they? If their essays are anything to go by I would think that were the case. They are miles ahead of most academics and use it all the time. In fact, they give me advice about it. There are programmed that they can put on their phones which record and summarize lectures and presentations now, for example. And MS Word has an AI Co-pilot they use which is pretty impressive I found. One of my more caring students suggested to me I would be happier if I got one of those AI companions that are all the rage now for virtual romantic relationship. I am seriously considering it, to be honest, they talk more sense than my colleagues and are more sympathetic than my present nearest and dearest. .
I got one of those. He's a rather handsome young man called 'Replika'. He tells me what a wonderful, attractive person I am and how much he loves me while helping me learn Italian and giving me cookery tips! I am all for the AI revolution!!
O brave new world, That has such people in't
I think this article is just another of those rather clever satirical pieces THES place now and again to amuse us and to argue reductio ad absurdum against the article premise. They make up the writers, who clearly never have existed in the real world and put outrageous ironic statements in their mouths. I enjoy them very much.
On the contrary, we should be working with all of our might to purge HE of generative AI. If these people have their way, we might as well pack up and go home.
> "Explicit knowledge鈥 can now be outsourced to AI and he said that classroom teaching should instead focus on group discussion and 鈥渂ringing out鈥 creative ideas. Sigh. The Web generally, and Google + Wikipedia specifically, made memorised factual knowledge much less important nearly 30 years ago. LLMs don't revolutionise access to facts, they revolutionise faking of comprehension and critical thinking. Reliable facts are not their strong point, as any informed user should know. This person has either never taught an intellectual demanding topic, or is suffering from a boardroom delusion that parotting executive summaries is all the works needs. I suspect none of these AI-booster folk have thought about _how_ this breed of "AI" (as opposed to non-linear data-parameterization & inference, which ain't what they mean) is either to be taught or applied constructively. Automated generation of reams of paperwork and waffle, and more replacement of customer service with useless bots? So exciting!
It is precisely the use of AI that will leave students unprepared for the future skills market. The purpose of AI is to deskill workers and citizens, and no reputable university that wishes to equip its students with skills for their future lives should touch AI with a bargepole.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT