糖心Vlog

More English universities sign up to IHRA antisemitism definition

OfS releases latest figures on universities adopting definition following ministerial pressure

Published on
November 10, 2021
Last updated
November 10, 2021

More than 200 English higher education institutions have聽adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of聽antisemitism following pressure from ministers.

Figures published by the Office for Students on 10聽November show that 95聽universities have signed聽up, a聽rise from the 28 identified by the Union of Jewish Students last year.

Former education secretary Gavin Williamson had urged universities to adopt the definition. 鈥淚f聽universities ignore the issue, I聽have asked officials to consider options e.g. directing the Office for Students to impose a new registration condition or suspending funding,鈥 he .

But critics of that stance argue that the IHRA definition could stifle legitimate criticism of Israel in universities and harm academic freedom.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Among the absentees from the list is SOAS University of London. The institution鈥檚 director, Adam Habib, admitted earlier this year that there were 鈥渃hallenges of antisemitic behaviour, individual cases in聽SOAS, as exist in many other places鈥, but said it was possible to achieve a culture that does聽not 鈥渢olerate any racist or discriminatory behaviour鈥ithout adopting one or other definition鈥.

Chris Millward, the OfS鈥 director of fair access and participation, said the IHRA definition was 鈥渁 useful way of understanding antisemitism, which enables universities and colleges to interpret and tackle antisemitism on campus鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淭he OfS published a statement of expectations for preventing and tackling harassment earlier this year, and we are clear that we will consider further action if universities do not take the steps necessary to meet these expectations during the next academic year,鈥 Mr Millward said.

Michelle Donelan, the higher education minister, said 鈥渨e must do all we can to root out antisemitism wherever we find it鈥.

鈥淭hat requires a common understanding of what antisemitism is and the forms it takes in modern society鈥t is encouraging to see so many universities take up the IHRA definition in the past year 鈥 but there is more work to do to end the scourge of聽antisemitism on our campuses, and I聽will continue to work with university leaders to demand action and urge progress,鈥 she said.

SOAS refunded a student 拢15,000 in fees after he said he was forced to abandon his studies because of a 鈥渢oxic antisemitic environment鈥, it聽was .

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Asked at an event in February whether SOAS would adopt the IHRA definition, Professor Habib said a 鈥淪OAS charter of values鈥 had been adopted, making clear that the institution 鈥渁bhors all forms of discrimination, including racism, including antisemitism, including Islamophobia, and that we鈥檙e going to stand firmly against all of this鈥n a manner that ensures academic freedom continues鈥.

He continued: 鈥淚f somebody is teaching in a course about why the boycott and disinvestment campaign is an appropriate campaign in the Israeli conflict, we鈥檙e going to allow that. Because that鈥檚 allowed by the right of academic freedom.

鈥淏ut we will allow as much the critique of the boycott and disinvestment campaign, by another scholar or by another student, because that is also to be defended by the agenda [the SOAS charter].鈥

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

One point of interest to academics is the recommendation in the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Memory Laws Project Preliminary Recommendations of December 2019 that the law should: "Provide and affirm protections for scholars, educators, journalists, writers, and general researchers who engage in, present, and publish bona fide, data-driven research on Holocaust-era crimes." A good deal will depend on how this is interpreted in relation to the large body of revisionist literature, which is sometimes classified by campaign groups as "denial" and in some instances prosecuted under various national laws in countries where the equivalent to the 1st Amendment in the USA on protection of free speech does not exist.
Since Stern has pronounced that it was never intended to be deployed in this manner, it is a shame that the IHRA definition and its examples have been adopted. There exists the alternative JDA (although that too might be abused contrary to its intentions). UKHE should not surrender in this manner. It is a disservice to left Jews such as JVL and Jewish Socialist who are being expelled from the Labour Party.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT