糖心Vlog

Let students review marked exam scripts, says thinktank

Hepi paper says keeping papers under lock and key could be harming student learning

Published on
November 21, 2024
Last updated
November 22, 2024
Examination hall in Birmingham to illustrate Let students review marked exam scripts, says thinktank
Source: Andrew Fox / Alamy

Few聽UK聽universities allow undergraduates to聽access their marked exam scripts, according to聽research that warns that a聽lack of聽transparency is聽harming student learning.

The report, published by the 糖心Vlog Policy Institute (Hepi) on 21聽November, found that changes to聽legislation and assessment practice over time have led to a聽鈥減otentially confusing patchwork of聽regulations鈥澛燼cross universities.

Researchers found that 52聽per cent of Universities聽UK members have a published policy on students鈥 access to exam scripts, and 79聽per cent of Russell Group institutions聽do.

The report reveals significant variation in internal practices 鈥 with a few departments allowing students full access, others limited access, and some none at聽all. And while some universities permit all students to view their script under controlled conditions, others allow them to make copies of their scripts for personal use or to share with others.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Of the 105 institutions to publish policies, only 34聽per cent give students the right to view their marked scripts. A further 19聽per cent expressly prohibit it, and 47聽per cent leave the decision up to schools and faculties.

According to senior university staff interviewed for the report, many institutions do not allow access because they believe students would not聽benefit from the limited feedback, they are concerned about large administrative costs and security around the exam process, and there is a tendency for university policies to be 鈥渁nchored to historic practice鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Rohan Selva-Radov, author of the report, said the findings revealed a pressing need for greater transparency and consistency from universities in how they approach the issue.

鈥淎s expectations of higher education institutions continue to evolve, it鈥檚 crucial that assessment practices keep pace, fostering a culture of openness and continuous improvement,鈥 he said.

He also said many of the senior university staff interviewed saw new technologies as a聽way of mitigating universities鈥 concerns 鈥 a聽move towards online exams, for example, could allow for greater use of automated feedback.

A lack of access to exam scripts reduces students鈥 ability to gain feedback and learn, particularly as it becomes more common for students to聽have assessments throughout their course rather than as a single set of final exams, according to the report.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Hepi says such opacity also undermines confidence in the assessment system and creates a wider perception of marking as an 鈥渦nreliable black box鈥.

The report warns that school exam boards 鈥 at GCSE and A聽level 鈥 are much further ahead in offering access to scripts, and have reported positive outcomes for learners, teachers and their organisations.

Nick Hillman, director of Hepi, said: 鈥淭he issue of transparency in exams is not discussed within higher education as much as we believe it should be. It is one area where the higher education sector seems to have fallen some way behind schools.鈥

The findings should be a 鈥渨ake-up call鈥 for institutions to reconsider their practices and for policymakers to consider if clearer guidance is needed, he added.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The report calls for all universities to publish a policy outlining their approach to student access to exam scripts, with the default position being full access.

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

Comments by markers on students' assessments have two purposes. First to provide feedback to students to aid their learning. Second, to explain and justify the mark to second markers and external examiners. Comments on exam scripts usually serve only the second purpose because, as is noted in the report, it is not common for students to see their scripts. Making the latter the norm, i.e., all scripts seen by all students, would increase the work of markers and reduce the efficiency of exams as an assessment method. This is not necessarily an argument against the practice but to highlight an addition to the increasing workload of academics if such a policy was adopted.
We make exam scripts available to continuing students in controlled sessions. We make it very clear to students that there is ni "feedback" on exam scripts and that comments are there to justify the mark to examiners and not provide them with feedback, but they find the exercise useful none the less. With the exception of a reduction in the number of outright rude or mocking comments on scripts, this hasn't materially changed how we mark or annotate scripts in then7 or 8 years since we introduced the policy.
Oh yes Hepi want to make academic spend even longer on exam scripts having to put loads of comments to justify the marks. Academics can barely mark exams on time as it is, without having to add loads of annotations. Some of the people at Hepi have nothing better to do with their time than further increase the unsustainable workloads that academics already do. Students won't use it as a feedback exercise they will use it as a way to get their marks raised further and this will result in appeals and so on and just more addition to the unsustainable workloads.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT