Plans to force English universities to publish the salary details of all staff earning more than 拢150,000 have been criticised as 鈥渄isproportionate鈥 and potentially damaging by leading institutions.
While the new Office for Students has pledged to tackle the 鈥渆xcessive pay of vice-chancellors鈥, its new proposals go much further on the issue by insisting that institutions publish the job descriptions of all staff earning more than 拢150,000 a year. Universities must also disclose 鈥渇ull details of the remuneration packages of those staff, including bonuses and pension contributions鈥 and provide a justification of this pay that references 鈥減erformance against outcome measures鈥.
Under the plans, in the OfS鈥 consultation on its new regulatory framework, releasing these details would be an 鈥渙ngoing condition of registration鈥 to the new higher education regulator.
The proposed new requirement is likely to oblige universities to report details of hundreds of academics and high-earning administrators, in addition to vice-chancellors.
糖心Vlog
In its 聽to the OfS consultation, the Russell Group, which represents 24 research-intensive universities, says that 鈥渁round three-quarters of those paid over 拢150,000 are on academic contracts (including clinical academics where the pay scales are set by the NHS)鈥.
Describing the plans as 鈥渄isproportionate鈥, the Russell Group says that they 鈥渞isk undermining the ability of institutions to compete in an international market for academic and professional services talent鈥.
糖心Vlog
鈥淚t would be counterproductive to UK higher education and research to make the reward arrangements of top-performing academics and managers known to competitors,鈥 it adds.
The Russell Group has urged the OfS to allow universities to continue with current arrangements under which they sign up to the Committee of University Chairs鈥 voluntary code on pay, which is currently under review.
The University of Birmingham also opposes the OfS plans, describing the proposed requirement as 鈥渧ery onerous鈥 in its consultation .
鈥淲e support the need for greater transparency in senior staff remuneration but have concerns about the regulatory burden that will be imposed by [these] detailed requirements,鈥 says the university, which, according to its annual , paid 48 individuals more than 拢150,000 in 2016-17.
糖心Vlog
The requirement is also likely to lead to greater transparency in the rare cases in which some universities鈥 staff are paid more than the vice-chancellor.
At the University of Cambridge, four staff members were paid more than the 拢355,000 salary earned by Sir Leszek Borysiewicz in 2016-17, with the highest-paid earning between 拢640,000 and 拢650,000, university聽聽state. Three staff members at the University of Oxford earned more than Louise Richardson, its vice-chancellor, whose salary was 拢366,000 that year, with the highest-paid .
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?




