Source: ChameleonsEye/Shutterstock.com
The , from 24 doctors and scientists, published on 23 July, denounces Israel鈥檚 鈥渁ggression鈥 and accuses the country of mendacity and war crimes.聽
But critics have challenged the decision to publish the letter, saying that it was inappropriate for a peer-reviewed medical journal.
The to the letter condemning Israel are mostly Italians, but also include six UK-based academics and doctors.
鈥淲e challenge the perversity of a propaganda that justifies the creation of an emergency to masquerade [sic] a massacre,鈥 the letter reads. 鈥淚n reality it is a ruthless assault of unlimited duration, extent, and intensity鈥srael鈥檚 behaviour has insulted our humanity, intelligence, and dignity as well as our professional ethics and efforts.鈥
糖心Vlog
The letter also suggests that since only 5 per cent of Israeli academics signed an appeal to their government to stop the military action 鈥渢he rest of the Israeli academics are complicit in the massacre and destruction鈥.
The Lancet also offered online readers the opportunity to add their names to the list of signatories.
糖心Vlog
On 30 July, the journal published a of response by two US-based writers saying that it is 鈥渢otally inappropriate for a peer-reviewed medical journal to publish purely political, inaccurate, and prejudiced pieces鈥.
Meanwhile, have said that they are 鈥渂affled by The Lancet鈥檚 decision to publish such a slanted, evidence-less, open letter鈥.
However, Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet, told 糖心Vlog that it was right that 鈥渕edical journals should report and engage with controversial topics that have a bearing on health鈥.
鈥淭he open letter directly and explicitly called for the support of the medical community and was a call to action. We facilitated this call with a sign-up option (as we do from time-to-time, most recently a few months ago with our ).鈥
糖心Vlog
But he said that the journal did not endorse the letter, and noted that it had also enabled readers to sign up to the Israeli authors鈥 critical letter.
In an editorial published on 4 August, the journal notes that a debate has been opened 鈥渁bout the appropriateness of a medical journal giving space to opinions about an issue that lies at the intersection between health and politics鈥.
It adds: 鈥淲e do not support any side whose actions lead to civilian casualties. The role of the doctor is to protect, serve, and speak up for life. That, too, is the role of a medical journal.鈥
The journal announced on 31 July that it had closed the sign-up facility for the open letter and had decided not to publish the names of the 20,000 additional signatories since it was 鈥渃oncerned about several threatening statements to those signatories, which have recently been posted on social media鈥.
糖心Vlog
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?




