糖心Vlog

Laissez-faire attitude to Sarkozy's reforms as election looms

Economic crisis leaves French politicians tight-lipped on universities budget. Clea Caulcutt writes

Published on
March 15, 2012
Last updated
February 16, 2017




In the run-up to the French presidential elections, the Socialist Party is insisting that it will not backtrack on the current government鈥檚 controversial overhaul of higher education.

Instead the party promises more funds for academia as an investment in 鈥渆conomic development鈥.

But despite a widespread belief that substantially increased tuition fees are on the agenda for the next government regardless of its political hue, it remains an issue that neither the Socialist Party nor president Nicolas Sarkozy鈥檚 ruling Union for a Popular Movement dare address head on.

鈥淚鈥檓 all for universities gaining greater autonomy,鈥 said Socialist presidential hopeful Fran莽ois Hollande in April last year, referring to a reform by the right-of-centre government that sparked massive protests in 2009.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

In 2007, Sarkozy completely overhauled higher education, giving public universities more autonomy and allowing them to raise funds from private sources.

The reform was deeply resented and perceived as a first step towards cutting state funding for higher education. 鈥淧olitical parties who can鈥檛 see that academics want this reform repealed suffer from amnesia,鈥 says St茅phane Tassel, head of the academic union SNESUP.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Hollande says he will not repeal the reform, but wants to simplify funding and give state universities real freedom by investing in higher education.

鈥淲e must invest heavily in French universities,鈥 argues Bertrand Monthubert, Socialist representative for higher education, 鈥渂ecause France needs more and more people who have obtained a higher education degree.鈥

鈥淔rance suffers a competitive disadvantage because it has fewer educated professionals than, say, the United States,鈥 says Monthubert, adding that the Socialist Party wants to create 5,000 new jobs in academia.

But with the economic crisis hitting France hard, his party is reluctant to put a figure on its ambitious investment plan for higher education.

Hollande banks on reducing tax loopholes, and on France pulling out of the recession - a risky bet given that the eurozone is still reeling from the debt crisis.

鈥淚n times of high debt and recession, we have to act responsibly,鈥 says Monthubert.

鈥淲e are not going to worsen France鈥檚 financial situation, but investing in higher education is tantamount to investing in economic development.鈥

Sarkozy鈥檚 UMP is also reluctant to set out clear targets for the future. Currently, even keeping old promises is a challenge. In 2009, Sarkozy launched a loan programme to invest 鈧35 billion (拢29 billion) in the French economy, earmarking 鈧19 billion for higher education and research.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Tassel complains that the government is not fulfilling its pledges. 鈥淲e are very far from the billions that were announced; actually, we don鈥檛 see the money coming through,鈥 he says.

Disappointed

In an interview with Le Monde, Laurent Wauquiez, the minister for higher education, insisted that his government is 鈥渃atching up on 30 years of funding shortages for higher education鈥.

鈥淲e have started. But to succeed, we have to continue depending on the means at the state鈥檚 disposal.鈥

Academics are still disappointed that neither of the two main parties has set out tangible investment targets for higher education.

French state universities are underfunded - Paris-Sorbonne University (Paris IV) spends only about 鈧3,000 per year per student, in contrast to the 鈧110,000 spent on an undergraduate at Princeton University in the US, according to figures cited by the BBC in 2009.

鈥淚t鈥檚 embarrassing that the parties are not displaying high ambitions for academia,鈥 says Yves Lecointe, president of Nantes University. 鈥淏ut given the state of the economy we couldn鈥檛 expect much.鈥

The Conf茅rence des Grandes 脡coles (CGE), an organisation that represents elite institutions, is calling on the government to allocate an extra 鈧20 billion - 1 per cent of GDP - to higher education.

The CGE suggests that students should contribute tuition fees amounting to 鈧3,000 after they have completed their studies. Currently, state-funded universities鈥 very low tuition fees, which are set by the ministry of higher education, cover only 2 to 3 per cent of the institutions鈥 budgets. (In contrast, grandes 茅coles, which include both public and private institutions, each have their own policy on fees.)

鈥淭he key idea here is that the students give back to education only if they are successful,鈥 says Pierre Tapie, president of the CGE and head of ESSEC Business School. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a win-win situation.鈥

Another sector body, the Conf茅rence des Pr茅sidents d鈥橴niversit茅, has also admitted that it would support higher tuition fees if the government introduced an efficient scholarship system for disadvantaged families.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

In the run-up to presidential elections in April, the issue of raising tuition fees is the elephant in the room - an explosive topic that neither the Socialists nor the UMP dare address.

Lecointe says higher tuition fees are 鈥渢he missing parts of the puzzle鈥. 鈥淚f you look at all the reforms that have been introduced since 2007, conservatives clearly have tuition fees on their agenda,鈥 he adds.

But Wauquiez denies that his government is considering raising tuition fees.

鈥淚n times of crisis, such a move would be unacceptable, especially when everybody is worried about their buying power,鈥 Wauquiez told Le Monde.

New sources of funding

However, Lucie Delaporte, a journalist covering higher education for the French news website Mediapart, says that higher tuition fees seem inevitable.

鈥淯niversities are looking for new sources of funding since the reform on autonomy,鈥 says Delaporte. 鈥淭hey know the state is not going to give them more money, so they are considering introducing tuition fees.鈥

The 2007 reform also allowed universities to seek alternative sources of funding, and appeal to the private sector and alumni.

Mich猫le Tabarot, a UMP member of the National Assembly who heads the commission for cultural and educational affairs, says businesses are at the heart of the government鈥檚 plans to reform higher education over the next few years.

鈥淥ne of our ambitions is to bring together universities and businesses, and encourage the private sector to finance research,鈥 says Tabarot.

While many universities have created foundations, some acknowledge that persuading French alumni and businesses to invest in state universities is a slow process. Increasing tuition fees would be an immediate financial boon for universities.

Paris-based thinktank Terra Nova, which is close to the Socialist Party, suggests trebling tuition fees, a move that would give higher education institutions an extra 鈧1 billion per year and help fight student absenteeism.

But the Socialist Party has denied allegations that it plans to hike tuition fees if it wins power in the next election.

鈥淲e should reform income tax instead of introducing a complicated mechanism of fees to fund universities,鈥 says Monthubert, who wants a fairer distribution of resources.

The current government has pitted universities against one another to obtain state funding, a move that has increased inequalities.

鈥淭he funding gap has widened over the past five years; some are very very rich and others very poor,鈥 says Delaporte. 鈥淪ome will probably close.鈥

Poorer universities enter a vicious circle, some claim, in which reduced funding from the state encourages researchers and students to move to larger universities, thereby further reducing funding. Universities in the west of France, such as La Rochelle University, are hit particularly hard.

But unless the Socialists pull back on university autonomy, this trend is unlikely to stop.

鈥淭he Socialists don鈥檛 admit it, but they agree with conservatives in thinking that higher education in France needs to evolve, that it should be structured around several poles of excellence,鈥 says Delaporte.

But critics argue that this makes it harder for some students who do not have the means to live in larger cities to access higher education.

Delaporte adds: 鈥淪ocialists give conservatives a lot of flak because they haven鈥檛 addressed this issue, but it鈥檚 not clear what [alternative] they have to offer.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT