糖心Vlog

King鈥檚 updates at-risk staff via external forum

Use of comments section of THE鈥檚 website to apprise staff of revised redundancy plans defended

Published on
July 10, 2014
Last updated
June 10, 2015

King鈥檚 College London has defended its decision to update staff on its restructuring plans via 糖心Vlog鈥檚 comments board.

In response to a series of critical posts over its original plans to cut up to 120 jobs from three health schools, King鈥檚 announced on 3 July that the number of at-risk positions had been halved to just 60.

In a comment posted under an opinion article on the King鈥檚 plans, a university spokesman explained that 60 roles represent 鈥渓ess than 3.2 per cent of our academic workforce鈥 and that King鈥檚 would have 鈥25 per cent spare capacity in our teaching capability across the three schools鈥 once the restructuring was complete.

He also admonished the university鈥檚 critics, saying that it was 鈥渁 matter of regret that some of our own community have chosen to be publicly critical of the current restructuring process before engaging directly with senior management鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

But several academics affected by the redundancy consultation hit out at the manner of the announcement.

Mitul Mehta, a senior lecturer based at the Institute of Psychiatry, said that it was 鈥渞emarkable that the changes in the numbers under threat of redundancy are announced鈥n the comments section of an opinion article鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淕oing external with crucial information without first informing staff is behaviour that staff and students are themselves being accused of,鈥 Dr Mehta said.

However, King鈥檚 argued that it considered it crucial to respond to staff concerns quickly after concluding a review of its plans.

鈥淲e felt that it was important to update readers of the THE opinion piece with the current situation as soon as possible,鈥 a spokeswoman said.

鈥淲e are offering individuals still provisionally at risk support and guidance on next steps, and will be providing staff in the three health schools with more information at the forthcoming staff briefing sessions,鈥 she added.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

She went on to say that King鈥檚 had 鈥渟tarted the process of updating unions, staff and the students鈥 union on Thursday last week [3 July] on the outcome of the final panel considerations鈥, which had led to the halving of the number of at-risk positions.

The THE post came the same day the University and College Union branch at King鈥檚 announced that it would hold a one-day strike on 10 July as Princess Anne visited the institution to open a new neuroscience building.

UCU regional official Barry Jones seemed unaware that the number of posts at risk had been altered at the time of that announcement, saying: 鈥淪acking 120 staff will do absolutely nothing positive for King鈥檚 College鈥檚 academic reputation.鈥

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

By introducing a consultation via the comment pages of 糖心Vlog, KCL management ensures some level of understanding to outside observers. Your seven points require equally explicit answers. I hope the anonymouse KCL spokesman will soon reply below. By various perspectives, it is ridiculous, tragic, pitiful that academics should be afraid to lose their jobs for speaking out: and yet this fear to state one's informed opinion is a serious issue at this time, at least in the UK. Other stories in this issue of the 糖心Vlog should help reverse the tide.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT