King鈥檚 College London has apologised for blocking from its campus 13 students and one staff member during a visit by the Queen as it suspected them of being part of previous protests, saying those actions were 鈥渨rong and did not meet our values鈥.
Evelyn Welch, acting principal of King鈥檚, issued the statement after an independent review found that the institution breached data protection laws and institutional data regulations in passing the students鈥 names to the police, as well as in withdrawing their card access to university premises. Passing students鈥 names to the police when there was 鈥渘either evidence of criminal activity nor any internal disciplinary findings鈥 was also a 鈥渟ignificant breach of trust鈥 and a 鈥渇ailure to protect the well-being and future prospects of King鈥檚 students鈥, while blocking their access to college buildings was 鈥渄isproportionate and against King鈥檚 stated values鈥, the review says.
The review recommends that the data breaches 鈥渟hould be reported to the Information Commissioner鈥檚 Office with immediate effect鈥, and that an apology should be issued to the students and staff member.
The review, written by Laura Gibbs, concludes that the King鈥檚 security team 鈥渁nd sections of the estates and facilities team鈥, while 鈥渦nder considerable strain and against the backdrop of balancing the right to freedom of expression against maintaining a safe campus, have overstepped the boundaries of their authority and in doing so have lost overall sight of their role in protecting the students and staff of King鈥檚鈥.
糖心Vlog
The review also says: 鈥淔reedom of speech and protest are closely linked, free speech would mean nothing if there was no right to make your views known.鈥
Professor Welch writes in a statement which precedes the report that the document 鈥渉as been uncomfortable to read鈥.
糖心Vlog
The report 鈥渕akes it clear that the actions we took with respect to our students were wrong and did not meet our values,鈥 she adds. 鈥淲e accept its findings and recommendations in full and are putting in place a plan to address all the issues that have been raised.鈥
The review relates to events leading up to 19 March, when the Queen visited King鈥檚 for the official opening of its Bush House building in central London.
The report explains that the students involved in the incident were suspected of being part of a protest outside an Israel Society event on 4 March, with a list of student names compiled 鈥渂ased on identification of students from photographic and CCTV evidence against time stamped gate access records to buildings鈥.
At least one name on the list, the staff member, 鈥渨as wrongly identified鈥, says the report.
糖心Vlog
Ahead of the opening of Bush House, the King鈥檚 head of security, understood to be no longer working at the college, 鈥渨rote to his contacts at the Metropolitan Police alerting them to the fact he had received unconfirmed reports that students may make a disruptive protest on the day of the royal visit鈥, says the report.
The head of security told the police that the students belong to the King鈥檚 student union鈥檚 Intersectional Feminist Society聽and attached a document listing the 鈥渕ain protesters鈥, the report says.
The students and staff member had their card access to college buildings revoked for the day of the visit. One student reported being worried he would miss an exam as a result, while another said she ended up being late for an assessed presentation and had to 鈥渂eg to the point of tears to be let in鈥, the report says.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?







