糖心Vlog

Keep trade books out of open access policy, says Universities聽UK

New report also calls for policy to consider embargo periods

Published on
October 8, 2019
Last updated
October 8, 2019
woman reading in a bookshop
Source: iStock

Trade books should be exempt from future policy on open access monographs while embargo periods should also be considered, Universities聽UK has recommended.

A published by UUK鈥檚 Open Access Monographs Group says 鈥渋mmediate open access for all monographs may not be feasible鈥 and instead endorses a 鈥渕ixed-model policy that offers various routes to compliance鈥. This could include one that 鈥渙ffers a suitable period for delayed open access鈥, it adds, claiming that this may result in 鈥渓ower costs鈥 for publishers.

UUK also calls for trade books 鈥 titles for a non-specialist adult audience 鈥 to be 鈥渆xempt from a future OA policy on monographs鈥, adding that 鈥淥A policy should be clear about who or what decides the validity of a trade book, taking into account publishers鈥 professional assessment, as well as other factors such as the retail price point and print runs鈥.

It says funders should 鈥渃onsult with the community regarding the policy approach to academic books that are marketed towards a primarily scholarly audience, but cross over to the trade market and/or generate more individual unit sales than anticipated, after first publication鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

UUK would like the recommendations to be considered as part of the reviews of open access policy being conducted by UK聽Research and Innovation, and for the research excellence framework.

Open access advocates are openly opposed to green open access models 鈥 under which authors must wait a specific time after publication to share their work on open repositories 鈥 but some commercial publishing groups and learned societies argue that embargoes are necessary to protect business models.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The UUK report was published alongside a of open access books in the UK, carried out by consulting firm Fullstopp and supported by UKRI, Jisc and the British Academy.

The analysis found that about 26聽per cent of books submitted to the 2014 REF panels on social sciences and arts and humanities were trade titles, while some 9聽per cent were trade titles priced at 拢20 or less.

Meanwhile, 70聽per cent of publisher sales take place in the first two years after publication and 80聽per cent take place in the first three years, which could inform decisions on embargo periods for a non-immediate open access model for books, it says.

ellie.bothwell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts 鈥 and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT