糖心Vlog

Graduations at risk as UK marking boycott planned from 23 May

Academics at 44 institutions to refuse to mark work or set exams in midst of busy summer assessment period, in ongoing row over pay and pensions

Published on
May 6, 2022
Last updated
May 9, 2022
Source: Simon Baker

Union members at some of the UK鈥檚 biggest universities will start a聽marking boycott on 23聽May, potentially leaving students unable to聽graduate.

Academics at 44 institutions will stop marking work, returning marks and setting or sitting exams and coursework in the midst of the busy summer assessment season.

Among the institutions affected are Durham, Exeter, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, Nottingham and Sheffield universities as well as King鈥檚 College London.

It is the latest salvo in the University and College Union鈥檚 long-running rows with employers over pay, pensions and working conditions.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

After giving the mandatory 14 days鈥 notice on 6聽May, general secretary Jo Grady said vice-chancellors 鈥渘ow have two weeks to avoid the first UK-wide boycott of this kind in over a聽decade鈥.

In an email to members, Dr Grady warned that employers would likely threaten those taking part in the boycott with 100聽per cent pay deductions and promised to 鈥渄o everything possible to push back against this threat鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The union is also preparing to take a further 10聽days of strike action, although the timetable for this will not be decided until the union鈥檚 higher education committee meets on 12聽May.

All the branches participating in the marking boycott are demanding action on pay, workloads, casualisation and equality, while 26聽branches are also calling for a聽reversal of cuts to pensions provided by the Universities Superannuation Scheme.

The declining number of branches that achieved a mandate to continue industrial action 鈥 one in four of all those polled 鈥 led some within the union to聽advocate a聽change in聽tactics, but delegates at the sector conferences on pay and pensions voted in April in continue with action this academic year.

Dr Grady said no member was taking part lightly given that they 鈥渃hoose to work in universities because they love working with and supporting students鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

But, she said, staff have been 鈥減ushed to breaking point鈥 and the marking boycott was a 鈥渓ast resort for staff who feel like they have no other choice鈥.

Meanwhile, ahead of the third and final scheduled meeting on the 2022-23 pay award on 5聽May, the University and Colleges Employers Association marginally increased its offer so that most staff would get a聽2.9聽per cent pay rise, increasing to 7.5聽per cent for the lowest-paid.

This is still well short of the higher education unions鈥 demand of a pay rise of 2聽per cent above retail price index inflation, which is predicted to surpass 10聽per cent this summer.

In a letter outlining the latest offer, Raj Jethwa, Ucea鈥檚 chief executive, said that virtually all sectors were finding it impossible to get close to inflation at this time鈥 and that he believed the offer was 鈥渃omparable to very many others in the economy鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Reacting to the announcement of the marking boycott, Mr Jethwa said: 鈥淭here is deep regret about any student disruption, regardless of the level, and higher education institutions remain fully focused on protecting students and mitigating all attempts at disruption as best they can.

鈥淥f course, it is also extremely disappointing that UCU is encouraging this small proportion of its members at isolated [institutions] 鈥 mostly in isolated subject areas 鈥 to take industrial action which targets those students who have already endured so many recent disruptions.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Very disingenuous quote from Raj Jethwa. That only way one can make sense of the suggestion that the "union" is encouraging its "members" to do some, would be to regard the union and its members as seperable entities. The only way this makes sense is if by "UCU" Jethwa mean the union leadership. Yet the union leadership advised against this action, and the membership, via the unions democratic mechanisms, chose to ignore the advice of the leadership. Thus its more like the members encouraging the union, than vice versa.
Good point Ian, but the UCU is also doing a lot of encouraging. One reason I left the union last year is its method of balloting: one heavily-promoted 'Yes' case, actually attached to the ballot paper. It's backed up by hectoring messages from the President and NEC and brainless clenched fist posters. No balanced pros and cons offered. I'm surprised the Electoral Services agency is willing to go along with this. It's not how academics assess arguments, and it's wrong for a professional union. Maybe this is why turnouts are dropping.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT