ÌÇÐÄVlog

Gove A-level plans under fire from universities

Plans for universities to control the content of A-levels are likely to prove expensive and “unworkable� in many subjects, higher education institutions have warned.

Published on
November 10, 2012
Last updated
May 11, 2015

In an Ofqual report summarising responses to a consultation on proposed exam reform, published on 9 November, several major doubts about possible changes are raised by universities.

Michael Gove, the education secretary, had wanted universities - particularly those in the Russell Group - to design new A-level curricula.

The Ofqual report, titled ‘Impact assessment of A-level reforms’, says all higher education institutions raised concerns over plans for each A-level to require support from at least 20 universities, including 12 who are “respected� in that particular subject.

This condition posed a “significant resource implication on their organisation�, universities claim.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

“A few staff would be required to take a significant time out of their work to review A-levels�, the report says.

“This could potentially replace the time they spend on other HEI [higher education institution] activities, such as research and teaching.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

“As things stand at present, this time would not be recognised in the Research Assessment Exercises that influence HEI funding.�

Others criticised the proposed system as too bureaucratic, saying it would become an “administrative burden�.

“Some stakeholders also suggested that the current expectation of 20 universities that are required to support an A-level qualification is too high,� the Ofqual report says.

Some universities also felt “the current target of 20 universities would not be workable for some subjects,� the report adds.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

“For example, in Physics there are only 35 university departments, and therefore it would be unreasonable to expect these universities to work with all five [awarding organisations – ie, exam boards].�

Other concerns raised by higher education institutions include the “potential risk that HEI endorsement could distort the market� and create a “two-tier system� of exams.

“Providers and students might be swayed in their choice of exam board by the universities providing the endorsement.

“This could potentially create a two-tier system with a greater value given to qualifications endorsed by universities, such as Oxford or Cambridge�, the report says.

ÌÇÐÄVlog

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT