糖心Vlog

Gender pay gap growing across majority of UK universities

More than half of higher education institutions failed to improve gender pay equity last year

Published on
November 22, 2025
Last updated
November 22, 2025
A generic toilet sign on public toilets on Gurney Avenue in George Town in Malaysia
Source: iStock/undefined undefined

New analysis shows that the gender pay gap is growing at the majority of UK universities, prompting warnings of 鈥渘ational stagnation鈥 in equality.

Women鈥檚 rights organisation the Fawcett Society has designated 22 November national Equal Pay Day for 2025 鈥 when, on average, women would symbolically stop getting paid in comparison to men.

Analysis of official government data by 糖心Vlog reveals that this day would come a lot earlier in the year for many universities in the UK.

The median gender pay gap at Leeds Conservatoire was 32 per cent for 2024-25. Although this was an improvement on 42 per cent last year, it remains the largest in the country.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Female workers there earn 68p for every 拢1 that men earn and make up 30 per cent of employees in the highest paid quarter.

It was followed by the Arts University of Bournemouth (AUB), which had a 26 per cent gap, and the University of Buckingham (25 per cent).

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Fawcett Society chief executive Penny East told THE that it was disappointing to see so many universities struggle to make progress on closing their gender pay gaps, reflecting 鈥渘ational stagnation鈥 on improving equality.

She urged universities to examine their policies and organisational culture and take a proactive approach to understanding the experiences of female employees 鈥 including bringing in external support when needed.

鈥淢uch of this will be unseen and unspoken; women still fear their careers will be derailed by speaking out about poor working practices.

鈥淗ealthy, thriving and inclusive universities are key to a functioning society; if women who work in these places are continually underpaid or overlooked for promotion, it won鈥檛 just impact those women, but the quality of the education provision and institutions more broadly.鈥

THE鈥檚 analysis includes more than 120 institutions from the providing undergraduate education in 2024-25, and excludes school trusts and further education colleges.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Of those, 60 per cent failed to improve median gender pay equity in the past 12 months. Last year the opposite was true, with 59 per cent narrowing the gap.

Just five of the 20 members of the Russell Group included saw improvements in the last year. Of the group, Durham University has the largest median gender pay gap, which grew to 21 per cent last year, with women鈥檚 bonus pay 50 per cent lower than men.

Across the whole sector, the median pay gap for 2022-23 was unchanged from the year before at 9 per cent, according to the most recent .

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Jo Grady, general secretary of the University College Union, said the data confirms what women working in universities already know: the gender pay gap is far too big.

鈥淲omen are also more likely to face worse terms and conditions than their male counterparts, so universities鈥 addiction to low pay and insecure contracts exacerbates the problem. This is why we are balloting universities across the UK for strike action, and why vice-chancellors urgently need to address inequalities.鈥

A Buckingham spokesperson said: 鈥淲e have undertaken measures to address the gender pay gap through initiatives including a promotions, progression and regrading process as well as various policy updates.鈥

AUB said its gender pay gap could be blamed partly on the creation of a large number of student ambassador roles, which are overwhelmingly occupied by women. Its data for 2025-26 shows the median pay gap has fallen to 18 per cent.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Leeds Conservatoire was approached for comment.

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

Does this mean more senior female colleagues than male ae now leavung the profession due to CR or is that not a factor. How does the recent job losses of 10,000 or more impact on these figures?
Pay should reflect performance and a lot of women in Universities clock off early to pick up kids from school or "work from home" virtually all the time only doing their lectures then disappearing, so maybe the pay differential is justified.
It's very complex but I see a great many very senior female colleagues both female and male men who are in the top salary rankings and I see lots of colleagues male and female who earn much less. So many female colleagues are senior to me and paid more and I feel that senior management has let us down in general. So I feel very conflicted about this and this agenda, to be honest. I guess that things are still male dominated at senior level and this is reflected in the global stats, but as someone working at quote a junior level who is male it doesn't relate to my experience. So let's pay our senior female management colleagues more, but they are still failing us, male and female. Does this make sense?
" [If] women who work in these places are continually underpaid or overlooked for promotion...." We need to know precisely how the asserted gender pay gap is calculated. The suggestion of a pay differential, illegal in most places I know, is surely unfounded. I don't know of a university in the UK or Australia that has a pay differential for males and females for a given academic or other position. As for women being paid less because they are overlooked for promotion, I have not seen anything in Australia's affirmative action environment to suggest that women are overlooked for promotion. I can think of many cases where ill-equipped women were promoted because they were women, and well-equipped men were not promoted because they were men.
new
Agree. Either a rage bite post or the authors have no idea how basic statistics work. They have simply put in two bags - 1 all the males and in another all the females - and compared the two groups. If they could be arsed, they should have made several subcategories - by role and see if there is a grade difference. They then would find that universities do not discriminate against females. Anyways this is an old argument that has know collapsed and people have moved on.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT