糖心Vlog

EU leaders desert research in Brussels budget showdown

Silence of academics allowing politicians to abandon pledges to back Horizon Europe funding in crunch talks, observers warn

Published on
March 2, 2020
Last updated
March 2, 2020
Farmers protest in Brussels
Source: Reuters
Farmers have repeatedly descended on Brussels to protest, while the research community has been 鈥榯oo silent鈥

Individual countries are failing to champion European Union research spending, raising doubts about the bloc as a serious funder of science, university lobbyists in Brussels have warned after a recent budget summit ended in deadlock.

In recent years, Brussels policymakers have talked up research and innovation as a key part of what the EU does, proposing a record 鈧100聽billion (拢85聽billion) budget for Horizon Europe, a spending package starting next year. The European Parliament has been even more supportive, backing a budget of 鈧120聽billion for the seven-year programme.

But when it comes to the crunch, EU member states have fallen back into old habits, putting their weight behind spending items seen as national priorities rather than supporting pan-European investment in research and innovation, observers warn.

鈥淣obody defends research and education,鈥 said Kurt Deketelaere, secretary general of the League of European Research Universities. 鈥淣obody is making a priority of this at the member state level.鈥

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

At inconclusive talks over the EU鈥檚 2021-27 budget on 21聽February, the French battled to defend agricultural subsidies, while eastern states such as Hungary prioritised redistributive 鈥渃ohesion鈥 funding aimed at narrowing the continent鈥檚 east-west prosperity gap.

Meanwhile, a group dubbed the 鈥渇rugals鈥 鈭 the Netherlands, Denmark, Austria and Sweden 鈥 tried to keep a lid on EU spending.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The result was that even a plan to cut the Horizon Europe budget by 鈧2.6聽billion failed to gain traction.

鈥淲e鈥檙e quite worried about the fact that there is no more emphasis placed on research and innovation and the need to invest more ambitiously,鈥 said Enora Pruvot, deputy director for funding and governance at the European University Association.

Member states demonstrated a 鈥渓ack of commitment towards the mutually agreed ambitions that Horizon Europe reached last April鈥, said Christian Ehler, a German MEP and lawmaker deeply involved in crafting the programme.

The 鈥渇rugals鈥 tend to do well out of EU research schemes in terms of winning funds, a reflection of their strong science systems. However, that is often trumped by a domestic political need to limit payouts to Brussels.

For example, the Dutch prime minister, Mark Rutte, is under great pressure at home to keep the budget down, said Professor Deketelaere, even though 鈥渉is own universities will suffer drastically from this attitude鈥.

Meanwhile, said Ms Pruvot, France and Germany, the biggest contributors to the EU budget, 鈥渄o extremely well in Horizon聽2020 [Horizon Europe鈥檚 predecessor] and might do even better in Horizon Europe. But it鈥檚 just one out of several priorities.鈥

Ultimately, while many countries accept that research and innovation is crucial to the EU鈥檚 future, cuts to Horizon Europe would likely lead to fewer howls of protest at home than reductions in, say, agricultural subsidies.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淧olitical leaders make their calculations and ask: 鈥榃here do we have the most votes to lose?鈥欌 said Professor Deketelaere.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Farmers had repeatedly descended on Brussels to protest, he noted, while the research community has been 鈥渢oo silent鈥.

The UK, the second-biggest winner of Horizon聽2020 money, might have pressed the case for a more generous research budget, but it is no longer an EU member.

鈥淭hey are already missed at the table,鈥 said Professor Deketelaere. 鈥淭hey would have been a defender [of research]. It鈥檚 clear that it鈥檚 a profit centre and contributes to their leadership in the field.鈥

The UK is seeking 鈥渇ull association鈥 to Horizon Europe, according to the UK government, meaning that researchers at UK universities would be able to bid for money from the programme.

But with wider negotiations between Brussels and London fraught, and still no budget agreed among EU leaders, concern over delays to the start of Horizon Europe in 2021 is rising.

Before Horizon 2020 began, member states had signed off the budget the preceding February, said Ms Pruvot.

鈥淲e are already later than last time around,鈥 she added.

If there is still deadlock when Germany takes over the EU鈥檚 rotating presidency in July, 鈥渢hen we really are in uncharted territory鈥, she said.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, more implementation groundwork has been done this time than was the case with Horizon 2020, Ms Pruvot said. And in 2013, the European Parliament did not ratify the final package until November, and it was formally adopted by member states in December, within 30 days of Horizon 2020 starting, she explained.

david.matthews@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Research abandoned in EU budget wrangle

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

The EU鈥檚 next framework programme, Horizon Europe, is due to start in just over a year. But while its broad shape is settled, political wrangling over budget and participation rights means researchers are still unclear over their future funding prospects. David Matthews reports from Brussels

28 November

Reader's comments (1)

Europe needs a common vision鈥搊ne that inspires and excites everyone in the EU. This is not impossible. China, a much larger and more diverse polity, has a vision. Its politicians call it the Chinese Dream and, though it is two-thousand five hundred years old, it still attracts the loyalty (and sacrifices) of 95% of citizens. Perhaps more significantly, they have shared those goals for 2,500 years and by now, they're almost genetically imprinted. Ninety-nine percent of Chinese willingly forego present indulgences鈥揳 cultural characteristic we find puzzling鈥搒o that future generations will achieve the goals. The goals are sequenced according the Confucius' Instruction to Rulers in The Analects: "First enrich the people, then educate them." Mao adopted them as strategic goals in 1950 and everything that followed is 'Mao Thought.' Today, Confucius' first stage, enrichment, xiaokang, is usually translated as 'moderate prosperity' since, in 1978, Deng Xiaoping called on the Party to achieve xiaokang by the centenary of the founding of the Party, June 1, 2021. In 2011 PM Wen Jiabao defined xiaokang as 鈥榓 society in which no one is poor and everyone receives an education, has paid employment, more than enough food and clothing, access to medical services, old-age support, a home and a comfortable life鈥. China will reach that goal next years, on June 1, 2021. Confucius' next goal is more ambitious because it was about emancipating people from egoic bondage (all Chinese goals, including liberation, are collective!) by creating a society he called d脿t贸ng. Mao's favorite definition of d脿t贸ng, which he quoted often, is from Kang Youwei鈥檚 Liyun zhu, (Commentary on Liyun), here abridged: Now to have states, families, and selves is to allow each individual to maintain a sphere of selfishness. This infracts utterly the Universal Principle (gongli) and impedes progress. ...Therefore, not only states should be abolished, so that there would be no more struggle between the strong and the weak; families should also be done away with, so that there would no longer be inequality of love and affection [among men]; and, finally, selfishness itself should be banished, so that goods and services would not be used for private ends. ... The only [true way] is sharing the world in common by all (tienxia weigong) ... To share in common is to treat each and every one alike. There should be no distinction between high and low, no discrepancy between rich and poor, no segregation of human races, no inequal- ity between sexes. ... All should be educated and supported with the common property; none should depend on private possession. ... This is the way of the Great Community, d脿t贸ng which prevailed in the Age of Universal Peace. In 2017 President Xi announced two intermediate goals on the way to d脿t贸ng: the world's best Gini Coefficient by 2035 and, 鈥淏y 2049 we will reach new heights in every dimension of material, political, cultural and ethical, social, and ecological advancement: we will have modernized of our system and capacity for governance; we will be a global leader in composite national strength and international influence; everyone will be prosperous and enjoy happy, safe and healthy lives and our nation will be a proud, active member of the community of nations.鈥 There are surely universal aspirations that all Europeans share and which, articulated, can make policy formulation and execution as effective as China's.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT