Has the 鈥渕assification鈥 of higher education in China led to more or less inequality?
That is the central question asked by Ka Ho Mok and Jin Jiang, who work in the department of sociology and social policy at Lingnan University in Hong Kong, in a 鈥淢assification of higher education: challenges for admissions and graduate employment in China鈥.
It is published by the Centre for Global 糖心Vlog, an international partnership of universities funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the 糖心Vlog Funding Council for England (Hefce).
Recent research, note the authors, indicates that 鈥済raduates in Europe, North America and East Asia have been negatively affected in terms of employment and social mobility by the rapid expansion of higher education鈥. In the United States, for example, 鈥渁bout 52 per cent of four-year college graduates are in jobs that match their skills, whereas 48 per cent are overqualified for the work they do鈥he situation is similar in Britain.鈥
糖心Vlog
So did this also apply in China, wondered Professor Mok and Dr Jiang, a country that has witnessed 鈥渁 dramatic increase in higher education opportunities鈥 since 1988, with student numbers rising by more than a factor of 10 amid a 鈥渟trong tide of privatisation and marketisation鈥. What has the effect on "admissions鈥raduate employment and social mobility鈥 been in China?
To address this issue, the authors use a student鈥檚 鈥渇ather鈥檚 education and occupational status鈥 as measures of 鈥渁 family鈥檚 cultural capital and economic resources鈥. Since what they call 鈥渢he big bang of China鈥檚 higher education鈥, their findings point to 鈥渁n increase in the importance of a family鈥檚 educational resource (cultural capital) in determining a child鈥檚 higher education attendance鈥.
糖心Vlog
When it comes to students securing jobs after they have completed their degrees, the working paper reports that 鈥渢he importance of family background on employment persists and even increases amid the massification of higher education鈥.
Part of the explanation seems to be that 鈥渃ollege graduates鈥 families adopted a more aggressive means of helping their offspring in getting jobs than before. Instead of simply providing job information, families of college graduates became involved in direct interactions in the recruitment process during the massification of higher education.鈥
A survey of students confirmed that they 鈥渞egarded family background as playing a substantial role in college students鈥 employment and future development鈥.
The conclusion, for China and beyond, is both clear and stark: 鈥渢he expansion of higher education may not promote fairness but may instead intensify educational inequality鈥.
糖心Vlog
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?








