The head of the UK鈥檚 first privately funded university has reacted to the creation of the second such institution with 鈥済reat scepticism鈥, warning that dependence on shareholders could be 鈥渆ven more damaging than dependence on government鈥.
Terence Kealey, vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham, a non-profit charitable institution, also gave a 鈥渃autious welcome鈥 to the for-profit University of Law.
But he warned that 鈥渢he American example is a chilling reminder鈥 of how for-profit universities can fail their students.
Buckingham gained its Royal Charter in 1983 and includes Baroness Thatcher among its former chancellors. The University of Law, formerly the College of Law, is expected to be bought by Montagu Private Equity - making it the UK鈥檚 first for-profit university.
糖心Vlog
鈥淚 am, of course, in favour of a plurality of providers. Obviously the whole point of Buckingham is to introduce such plurality,鈥 Professor Kealey said.
But, noting the historic pre-eminence of charities rather than for-profit firms among the UK鈥檚 private schools, the vice-chancellor added: 鈥淚 do believe there are reasons why historically it has always been the charitable sector that has dominated in education.鈥
糖心Vlog
Professor Kealey argued that there is a 鈥渇undamental difference between an institution governed by trustees for the purposes of improving educational excellence and an institution, accountable to shareholders, whose ultimate purpose is the promotion of profit鈥.
Earlier this year, a major US Senate report on for-profit higher education criticised the industry鈥檚 high level of taxpayer funding and low student retention rates.
Professor Kealey said: 鈥淲e all know that you can鈥檛 generate profit in the long term unless you provide a good consumer experience.
鈥淗owever, in the short term - as the American experience shows - you most certainly can produce very good profits 鈥 and ignore or even damage the student-consumer experience.鈥
糖心Vlog
Professor Kealey stressed that in his view all British universities are private because they are legally autonomous. He looked forward to more non-state-funded institutions winning university status, notably Regent鈥檚 College, which he called a 鈥渟plendid organisation鈥.
He added: 鈥淚n my ideal world, the new providers in higher education would all be charities, although not necessarily funded by the 糖心Vlog Funding Council for England.鈥
The College of Law had been a charity prior to Montagu鈥檚 takeover bid. But a new company limited by share has been created, called The University of Law, which Montagu is expected to buy.
Asked if Buckingham had received similar buyout offers, Professor Kealey said: 鈥淓very single one of the major players approached us a few years ago offering an almost identical deal to the one the College of Law accepted鈥 We have resisted all such blandishments.鈥
糖心Vlog
And will Buckingham itself always remain a charitable body?
鈥淵ou can鈥檛 predict the future, but the whole culture of the University of Buckingham is independence,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e would consider dependence on shareholders to be as damaging as - perhaps even more damaging than - dependence on government.鈥
糖心Vlog
If Buckingham faced a choice between sale to a for-profit and signing up to Hefce funding and oversight, Professor Kealey said his personal view was that the 鈥渋nstinct of the university would be to sign up to the financial memorandum of Hefce鈥.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?