The chair of the Commons Science and Technology Committee has denied putting undue political pressure on the Natural Environment Research Council ahead of its widely welcomed decision to abandon the proposed merger between the British Antarctic Survey and the National Oceanography Centre.
On the eve of a meeting of Nerc鈥檚 council on 1 November, at which the final decision was due to be taken, the select committee released a report critical of the merger proposal.
It was published just hours after a committee hearing with senior Nerc figures, who insisted that the merger would promote scientific impact and synergy and save about 拢500,000 a year.
The proposal, published for consultation in September, provoked widespread concern about the loss of the iconic British Antarctic Survey name and what that might signal about the UK鈥檚 commitment to its presence in the South Atlantic.
糖心Vlog
In its report, published on 31 October, the select committee says Nerc had failed to provide an 鈥渁dequate evidence base鈥 and had not given adequate consideration to the BAS鈥 鈥済eopolitical role鈥.
Speaking to 糖心Vlog after Nerc鈥檚 decision to abandon the merger was announced on 2 November, the select committee鈥檚 chair, Andrew Miller, denied that the report鈥檚 conclusions had been determined before the hearing with Nerc took place.
糖心Vlog
He also defended the committee鈥檚 involvement, arguing that since its members were not ministers, the Haldane principle did not apply.
Mr Miller added that it had been impossible to ignore the high level of concern from 鈥渆xtremely reputable parts of the scientific community鈥 and prominent public figures such as the former US vice-president Al Gore.
He said that Nerc needed to think harder about how to 鈥渒eep up the morale of [its scientists] and protect the underlying science in the most cost-effective way鈥.
One suggestion was for it to make greater use of the Research Councils UK Shared Services Centre.
鈥淚t would be wrong to tell Nerc what it should be doing, but our attitude is very much that we want to help them,鈥 Mr Miller said.
糖心Vlog
He suggested that the select committee鈥檚 forthcoming inquiry into marine science could be an 鈥渙pportune moment鈥 to examine the issues in more detail.
Although Mr Miller said it was worth considering establishing a discrete funding stream for Antarctic 鈥渋nfrastructure and logistics鈥 - an idea first mooted during the select committee hearing by David Willetts, the universities and science minister - he worried that it might inhibit the coordination of polar science with programmes in related disciplines.
Mr Willetts told the hearing that Nerc鈥檚 final decision on the merger had been brought forward because there was such a level of public concern that it could be affecting morale at the BAS.
糖心Vlog
He welcomed the select committee鈥檚 decision to bring forward its own hearing - which it publicly called on Nerc chief executive Duncan Wingham to attend - and he was sure that its report would be 鈥渢aken very seriously鈥 by the research council.
Mr Willetts said that 鈥渢he organisation of operational matters within the UK鈥 was a matter for Nerc but added that the government had a legitimate interest because of its commitment to maintain a scientific 鈥渇ootprint鈥 in the Antarctic.
Mark Maslin, professor of climate science at University College London, praised Nerc for being 鈥渟trong and confident enough鈥 to reverse its original decision.
鈥淚 am not worried about political influence because scientists are also aware of the need to maintain a strong BAS to ensure continued excellent work in both the Arctic and Antarctic,鈥 he added.
糖心Vlog
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?



