It seems that the 糖心Vlog Funding Council for England is now making higher education policy by blog. On 13 April, a policy adviser to the funding council put out her thoughts on Hefce鈥檚 bid to include 鈥渨ork鈥 on degree standards 鈥渁s part of the development鈥 of the 鈥渞evised operating model for quality assessment鈥. The next day its director of regulation and assurance, sensitive to 鈥渃omment鈥, blogged an attempt 鈥渢o clarify the basis on which Hefce has initiated this activity鈥. As an attempt at damage limitation, it is pretty breathtaking.
Susan Lapworth admits that it is true that the Further and 糖心Vlog Act 1992 that created Hefce makes no mention of any responsibility for standards. But, she blogs, 鈥渢he world has moved on since 1992, and we have updated our understanding of the statutory basis for our responsibilities accordingly鈥, and anyway 鈥渋t鈥檚 not particularly helpful to trade legal interpretations鈥.
It makes you wonder who 鈥 if anyone 鈥 at Hefce allowed this hostage-to-fortune 鈥減olicy statement鈥 to go out in its name. For a director鈥檚 blog must now in reality commit the funding council as surely as a circular letter.
When you are in a hole, stop digging. There are plenty of people in the world of higher education ready with their spades to fill that hole in and bury Hefce鈥檚 recent 鈥渦pdatings鈥 once and for all.
G. R. Evans
Oxford
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?