It was unfortunate that Anna Notaro鈥檚 letter chose to make an聽unfounded accusation of 鈥減rejudicial attitudes towards Southern European citizens鈥 rather than engage with my argument that the European Union is a聽1950s institution unfit for the modern age (鈥Spanish supposition鈥, Letters, 7聽January).
I聽criticised the fact that Italian or Spanish citizens have more right to work and study here than their Asian counterparts because I聽believe that immigration should be based on skills, not nationality. My examples were random. Notaro鈥檚 opposite view is rather Eurocentric for my tastes, but I聽am sure it is not motivated by prejudice.
Ad hominem attacks come from a side that is losing the debate. I聽believe that come the referendum on UK membership in the EU, many academics will vote to leave, because they support British universities continuing to work on and receive funding from EU programmes, but also want them to be free to facilitate future global academic cooperation beyond Europe鈥檚 limited borders.
I聽wish Notaro well with her own research, which I聽have no doubt will flourish as Britain leaves the EU and leads the world in education and science.
Jamie Martin
London
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?