糖心Vlog

Routine atrocities

Published on
August 27, 2015
Last updated
August 27, 2015

In reviewing Debarati Sanyal鈥檚 Memory and Complicity: Migrations of Holocaust Remembrance (Books, 6 August), Robert Eaglestone summarises and endorses her argument that 鈥渢he memory of the Holocaust enables other memories of oppression and violence to appear鈥. The clearest example of this is apparently the Alain Resnais documentary Night and Fog (1955), 鈥渢he landmark film on the Nazi Genocide鈥, which 鈥渨as about the extermination of the European Jews, but also, allegorically, about the vicious French colonial war in Algeria鈥. The point about the 鈥渕ulti-directionality鈥 of Holocaust remembrance would have been more accurately made if it had been acknowledged that Resnais鈥 great film is not about the Holocaust as currently conceived. That narrative became dominant only in the 1960s after the Adolf Eichmann trial and the publication of Raul Hilberg鈥檚 The Destruction of the European Jews. There is no mention of 鈥済enocide鈥 or 鈥淗olocaust鈥 in Resnais鈥 film, and only one use of the words 鈥淛ew鈥 or 鈥淛ewish鈥. This occurs in a list of future inmates of the concentration camps 鈥 鈥淏urger, a German workman, Stern, a Jewish student from Amsterdam, Schmulski, a shopkeeper in Krakow, Annette, a schoolgirl in Bordeaux鈥. The emphasis falls on the many different nations represented in the camps rather than on Jews as the principal victims. This makes it easier for Resnais to imply connections between the Nazi atrocities and subsequent historical events but sets his film firmly apart from most Western narratives since the 1960s (the Soviet Union had always minimised the Jewish dimension).

Rowland Wymer
Emeritus professor of English
Anglia Ruskin University

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT