It was heartening to read Lars Fischer鈥檚 defence of book reviewing (鈥Scholarly book reviewing: time for a plot twist鈥, Opinion, 7 January). This is self-evidently a vital scholarly function that should be properly recognised and rewarded by all relevant systems, not least the research excellence framework. I聽applaud Fischer in particular for refusing in his own capacity as a reviews editor to work with publishers unwilling to give hard copies of their books to reviewers.
The same trend is spreading among journal publishers. I聽recently lost the possibility of a聽seat on an editorial board for insisting that members receive a聽copy of each issue. I聽have also had little traction with editors when I聽have asked them to dispute journal publishers鈥 withdrawal of聽author copies.
These commercial developments masquerade as 鈥渋nformation age鈥 progress, but in reality are crude and often unnecessary cost-cutting. It would be good to see more solidarity in the academic community on such matters.
Alistair Duff
Edinburgh Napier University
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?