Students and postdocs, as well as administrative staff, will always be considered expendable when they conflict with a senior academic (鈥Life with an abusive lab boss: one postdoc鈥檚 story鈥, Opinion, 15 September). Someone who brings in large amounts of research income is irreplaceable; they will never be dismissed for poor behaviour.
Several cases I know suggest that 鈥渄ignity at work鈥 policies are there so universities can claim that is how they work rather than actually to be followed. An employee inspired by the lofty sentiments in these policies to raise concerns about a senior is likely to find their concerns deemed 鈥渁ccusations鈥, to be called 鈥渧exatious鈥, and accused themselves of unreasonable behaviour.
Employee Assistance Programmes seem to be there so that universities can tell concern raisers: 鈥淵ou are the problem 鈥 go and get counselling about it.鈥 If they resist and say, 鈥淣o, the problem is my senior鈥檚 behaviour鈥, they will be accused of insubordination for not following the advice, and the further stress they experience because of their real concerns will be written off as 鈥測our fault because you did not get the help we suggested鈥.
Matthew Huntbach
London
Send to
Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in 糖心Vlog should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰鈥檚 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?